1981
DOI: 10.1016/0020-7225(81)90013-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eigenproblems associated with the discrete LBB condition for incompressible finite elements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Let n = 2, m = 1 (so N = 3), denote the columns of I 3 by e i , i = 1, 2, 3, and let and clearly (β −1 , e 2 ) is an eigenpair of S, 0 is a double algebraic, simple geometric eigenvalue, e 3 is the corresponding eigenvector and e 1 is the generalised eigenvector or principal eigenvector of grade 2. This behaviour is generic in N × N problems with the block structure of (2) as was shown by Malkus [9], who considered the Weierstrass-Kronecker canonical form of (2), and Ericsson [5], who considered the Jordan form for the shift-invert transformation of a variety of generalised eigenvalue problems. (Incidently, both authors restrict attention to problems with symmetric A but several of their results, at least to do with Jordan structure, extend to the case when A is nonsymmetric).…”
Section: If (λ X)mentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Let n = 2, m = 1 (so N = 3), denote the columns of I 3 by e i , i = 1, 2, 3, and let and clearly (β −1 , e 2 ) is an eigenpair of S, 0 is a double algebraic, simple geometric eigenvalue, e 3 is the corresponding eigenvector and e 1 is the generalised eigenvector or principal eigenvector of grade 2. This behaviour is generic in N × N problems with the block structure of (2) as was shown by Malkus [9], who considered the Weierstrass-Kronecker canonical form of (2), and Ericsson [5], who considered the Jordan form for the shift-invert transformation of a variety of generalised eigenvalue problems. (Incidently, both authors restrict attention to problems with symmetric A but several of their results, at least to do with Jordan structure, extend to the case when A is nonsymmetric).…”
Section: If (λ X)mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…y 1 ∈ R 1 can be achieved by y 1 ← S 1 y 1 . To apply B-orthogonal Arnoldi to S, one should start with v 1 , given by (9). This is achieved by v 1 ← Sv 1 , since…”
Section: Application Of B-orthogonalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proof can be found in [37] or [10]. The numerical test proposed in [11] consists in testing a particular formulation by calculating β using meshes of increasing refinement.…”
Section: Numerical Assessment Of the Inf-sup Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the element performance in the nearly incompressible range, we examine the optimality and stability conditions for small strain elasticity (see [24], for example) using the inf-sup test of Malkus [27]. More information on this topic can also be found in [28].…”
Section: Element Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%