2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11464-010-0067-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eigentime identity for asymmetric finite Markov chains

Abstract: Two kinds of eigentime identity for asymmetric finite Markov chains are proved both in the ergodic case and the transient case.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where the right hand side is the Kemeny's constant which is independent of the starting state i. We refer interested readers to Cui and Mao (2010); Kirkland (2014); Levene and Loizou (2002); Mao (2004); Pitman and Tang (2018) for further references on this parameter. • Forest representation of mean hitting time: Let G(P ) be the weighted direct graph on vertices X and arc weights to be the corresponding transition probabilities.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the right hand side is the Kemeny's constant which is independent of the starting state i. We refer interested readers to Cui and Mao (2010); Kirkland (2014); Levene and Loizou (2002); Mao (2004); Pitman and Tang (2018) for further references on this parameter. • Forest representation of mean hitting time: Let G(P ) be the weighted direct graph on vertices X and arc weights to be the corresponding transition probabilities.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where τ A := inf {t; X t ∈ A} is the first hitting time of A by X, and as usual we write τ j = τ {j} . Note that for uniformly ergodic Markov chain, the eigentime identity Aldous and Fill (2002); Cui and Mao (2010); Mao (2004) is given by…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, t av equals to the sum of the reciprocals of the non-zero eigenvalues of −Q, and it also has close connection with the notion of strong ergodicity, see for example Cui and Mao (2010); Mao (2004). • (Total variation mixing time) For > 0, we write the total variation mixing time t mix ( ) to be…”
Section: Geometric Interpretation Of M 1 and Mmentioning
confidence: 99%