2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.epidem.2014.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eight challenges for network epidemic models

Abstract: Networks offer a fertile framework for studying the spread of infection in human and animal populations. However, owing to the inherent high-dimensionality of networks themselves, modelling transmission through networks is mathematically and computationally challenging. Even the simplest network epidemic models present unanswered questions. Attempts to improve the practical usefulness of network models by including realistic features of contact networks and of host-pathogen biology (e.g. waning immunity) have … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
141
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
141
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, in network models there are difficulties for computing the reproduction number and the prevalence of the disease. Consequently, little can be learned of the effect of the immune response on these quantities outside of extensive simulations [52].…”
Section: A Network Epidemic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, in network models there are difficulties for computing the reproduction number and the prevalence of the disease. Consequently, little can be learned of the effect of the immune response on these quantities outside of extensive simulations [52].…”
Section: A Network Epidemic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While early models did not include complex population structure, modeling approaches now frequently let the epidemic spread take place on a network, which enables greater realism than a model in which all individuals mix homogeneously. It does, however, pose many technical problems for model analysis, particularly the question of how heterogeneity in the number of links each individual participates in-their degree-influences the epidemic [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, using measures of social mixing, such as number of contacts per day, can be highly consistent across regions [31,32], representative for most connectivities relevant to disease spread [33,34], and need not to be dataintensive [35].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%