“…Injury definition and exposure heterogeneity can limit interstudy comparability, and this was evident with three studies not reporting exposure rates and three studies reporting a different exposure rate (AE). Although more than half of the included studies [ 10 , 11 , 13 – 15 , 66 – 68 , 70 , 71 ] utilised an inclusive-type injury definition, this was evenly split, with five studies reporting an all-inclusive [ 10 , 13 – 15 , 68 ] injury definition and five studies reporting a fully-inclusive [ 11 , 66 , 67 , 70 , 71 ] injury definition. The use of these definitions is similar; however the fully-inclusive definition reports on missed match and training time and excludes injuries that require assistance from medical personnel [ 57 , 60 ].…”