Welfare Reform in Canada 2015
DOI: 10.3138/9781442609730-012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eight. Social Assistance in Alberta

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The eligibility requirements are much stricter than other disability programs. Recipients must have a permanent and untreatable condition (Wood, 2015). Those deemed eligible have the highest welfare adequacy of any family type discussed in this report, reaching 96 per cent of the poverty threshold (Table A14).…”
Section: Albertamentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The eligibility requirements are much stricter than other disability programs. Recipients must have a permanent and untreatable condition (Wood, 2015). Those deemed eligible have the highest welfare adequacy of any family type discussed in this report, reaching 96 per cent of the poverty threshold (Table A14).…”
Section: Albertamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Even among recipients who did not return to social assistance, 68.2 per cent reported being unable to always meet their shelter and food needs (Azmier and Roach, 1997). In 2003, the program was restructured to offer better employment services, health benefits and child support services (Wood, 2015).…”
Section: Albertamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perceptions of insecurity are tied to structural inequalities and disadvantage, and while economic precarity has become more salient for many, the experiences of people with disabilities makes those chronic stressors particular to them (Turner et al., 2017). With low employment rates, clustering in low paying jobs (Maroto and Pettinicchio, 2014), and less wealth, Canadians with disabilities often live in precarious states (Liu et al., 2013; Maroto, 2016; Maroto, 2019; Maroto & Pettinicchio, 2020; Morris et al., 2018; Shuey & Jovic, 2013) and are often left to rely on declining and restrictive government benefits (Crawford, 2013; Laidley & Tabbara, 2021; Maroto & Pettinicchio, 2020; Statistics Canada, 2021b; Wood, 2015). Not surprisingly, people with disabilities are also more likely to experience poverty (Pettinicchio and Maroto, 2017; Maroto & Pettinicchio, 2022; Wall, 2017).…”
Section: Chronic Stressors and Life Events: Disability Precarity And ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Means-tested benefits exclude many groups, particularly those with limited access to labor and financial markets, leaving them in a continuous struggle to stay afloat (Bagenstos 2017;Brown 2015;Whittle et al 2017). To determine eligibility for provincial programs, people with disabilities are means-assessed based on their disability, the extent to which they can work, and their overall financial status and assets, including any family or household savings (Wood 2015). Among people with disabilities who were active in the labor force but unemployed in 2006, 30 percent were less likely to look for work because they believed they would lose their government supports if employed (Crawford 2013).…”
Section: Institutions That Limit Economic Insecuritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to low or nonexistent employment income, one‐third of Canadians with disabilities receive income from sources other than the labor market, often from government transfers (Crawford 2013). However, means‐tested benefits typically mean households cannot exceed a level of allowable income and assets, which can disincentivize saving (Maroto and Pettinicchio 2020; Wood 2015). In turn, people with disabilities also have less savings and hold less wealth than people without disabilities (Maroto 2016; Maroto and Pettinicchio 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%