2020
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8334-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eikonal model analysis of elastic proton–proton collisions at 52.8 GeV and 8 TeV

Abstract: Under the influence of standardly used description of Coulomb-hadronic interference proposed by West and Yennie the protons have been interpreted as transparent objects; elastic events have been interpreted as more central than inelastic ones. It will be shown that using eikonal model the protons may be interpreted in agreement with usual ontological conception; elastic processes being more peripheral than inelastic ones. The corresponding results (differing fundamentally from the suggested hitherto models) wi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar property was recently discussed in [48,49]. Another important observation on the inelastic profile is the existence of a toroidal-like structure [50], later dubbed as 'hollowness' effect [51], which was also studied in subsequent works [36,52,53]. In Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Similar property was recently discussed in [48,49]. Another important observation on the inelastic profile is the existence of a toroidal-like structure [50], later dubbed as 'hollowness' effect [51], which was also studied in subsequent works [36,52,53]. In Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Here 1 F 1 (iα, 1; z) is one of the confluent hyper geometric functions 20 (see Chapter 9.21 in [24]): At energies up to 13 TeV and q 2 = −t 0.05 GeV 2 the values of z = B(s)q 2 /2 if of order 0.5 or less. At such z the function Γ(1 + iα) 1 F 1 (iα, 1; z) is extremely close to 1 and is exhaustively approximated by the following expression…”
Section: IIImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) -(5) which are of a general character 17. The importance of the t-dependence of the phase of the strong interaction amplitude was addressed in Refs [20],[10]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A peak in f (s, t) at |t| ∼ 0.5 GeV 2 corresponds to a peak in the profile function Γ(b) at large distances b ∼ 7.0/ |t| ∼ 2 fm (here 7.0 is the second maximum of the Bessel function J 0 (x)), However, a straightforward calculation of Γ(b) in this way does not give reliable results in the region where Γ(b) becomes very small and sensitive to assumed phase of the amplitude used, its spin structure, behavior at higher |t|, etc. Actually, more sophisticated and indirect approaches are to be used in order to analyze data on the described oscillation see, for example, [58][59][60].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%