1992
DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(92)90627-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eikonal quantum gravity and planckian scattering

Abstract: Various approaches to high energy forward scattering in quantum gravity are compared using the eikonal approximation. The massless limit of the eikonal is shown to be equivalent to other approximations for the same process, specifically the semiclassical calculation due to G. 't Hooft and the topological field theory due to H. and E. Verlinde. This comparison clarifies these previous results, as it is seen that the amplitude arises purely from a linearized gravitational interaction. The interpretation of poles… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
312
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(327 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
15
312
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, such strong growth would eventually violate the unitarity bound once E ∼ M D , indicating that a fuller string calculation is required at higher energies, where the emission and exchange of string states is no longer negligible [101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108]. Second, it shows that it is the highest energy KK states that dominate in the cross section, and since these also have the shortest wavelength their properties (and the cross section) is largely insensitive to the details of the higher-dimensional geometry [109].…”
Section: Jhep10(2011)119mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, such strong growth would eventually violate the unitarity bound once E ∼ M D , indicating that a fuller string calculation is required at higher energies, where the emission and exchange of string states is no longer negligible [101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108]. Second, it shows that it is the highest energy KK states that dominate in the cross section, and since these also have the shortest wavelength their properties (and the cross section) is largely insensitive to the details of the higher-dimensional geometry [109].…”
Section: Jhep10(2011)119mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It turns out that the loop expansion matches the expansion in powers of δ [7,33,34,35], so that the phase shift is given, in terms of the leading tree-level interaction A tree (s, t), by the simple Fourier transform…”
Section: Eikonal Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider the equation above for different values of w. In order for the inequality (35) to be valid for all w, we keep p − fixed and tune p + so that p = Λ/ |w| , for a fixed energy scale Λ ≪ E. As w → ∞, we then have that σ = 8Λp − /w 2 → 0. Note that F + , F − and A on−shell are all analytic functions of σ, with at most poles and branch cuts.…”
Section: Quantization Condition From Unitaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(7.16) Equation (7.16) is difficult to solve in general due to the transverse derivatives but it can be readily solved in the eikonal approximation. A simple plane-wave solution is given by 17) as one would expect from a computation of trajectories: the only effect of the shock-wave is a shift of the wave function over a distance given by the shift. The full solution gives, in the eikonal approximation,…”
Section: Boundary Description Of Scalar Fields In An Ads-shock-wave Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essentially this is the gravitational field surrounding a particle whose mass is dominated by kinetic energy therefore representing a sort of massless regime of General Relativity [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22].…”
Section: Gravity At High Energy and Shock Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%