1976
DOI: 10.1112/blms/8.1.34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ein Neuer Beweis der Nakayama-Vermutung Über die Blockstruktur Symmetrischer Gruppen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 corresponds to the set of /^-numbers 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 9 , 11, 13, 17. These are /J-numbers for a diagram having first column hook lengths 1,5,7,9,13; that is, for [9,6,5,4,1].…”
Section: -2 Removing a Skew Q-hook Is Equivalent To Decreasing A Fimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 corresponds to the set of /^-numbers 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 9 , 11, 13, 17. These are /J-numbers for a diagram having first column hook lengths 1,5,7,9,13; that is, for [9,6,5,4,1].…”
Section: -2 Removing a Skew Q-hook Is Equivalent To Decreasing A Fimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Section 3 contains prerequisites for the proof of the main result which is then given in Section 4. The outline of the proof is similar to that given in [5] by Meier and Tappe for the linear case, but the details are quite different in the projective case.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…
In 1940, Nakayama conjectured that the assignment of irreducible linear representations of the symmetric groups into /^-blocks could be achieved by determining the/>-cores of the Young diagrams associated with the representations. Several proofs of this result are known (see [5]). In [6], Morris conjectured that, at least for odd primes p, a similar result should hold using the p-b&r core to assign irreducible projective representations of the symmetric group into /^-blocks.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Nakayama's conjecture was proved in 1947 by Brauer and Robinson [1]. Since then, several different proofs have been published, the shortest of which is probably that given in the paper by Meier and Tappe [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the previous section we generalized equation (2) to get formula (3). In this section we will make further generalizations.…”
Section: The Murnaghan-nakayama Rulementioning
confidence: 99%