2016
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-107255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ein Selbstbeurteilungsinstrument zur Erfassung von Dermatillomanie: Reliabilität und Validität der deutschsprachigen Version der Skin Picking Scale-Revised

Abstract: At least since the introduction of the official diagnosis Excoriation (Skin-Picking) Disorder in the DSM-5 [1], dermatillomania is an important and growing field of research. Despite the high importance currently a huge lack of German assessment instruments exists. Aim of the present study was the examination of the psychometric properties of the German translation of the Skin Picking Scale-Revised [2]. For this purpose an open online study has been conducted. The analysis of N=2 065 data sets indicated a high… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“… The Questionnaire for the Assessment of Self-Disgust (QASD; Schienle et al 2014 ) has two subscales “Disgusting Self” (nine items; Guttman’s λ4 = 0.81) and “Disgusting Ways” (six items; Guttman’s λ4 = 0.81) which assess disgust-related self-concept (e.g., “I find myself repulsive”) and behavior (e.g., “I regret my behavior”). The Skin Picking Scale revised (SPS-R; Gallinat et al 2016 ) has two sub scales (4 items each) which describe “symptom severity” (Cronbach`s α = 0.96) and “impairment” (α = 0.95) by the picking during the last week. Each item is rated on 5-point scales (e.g., “How often to you feel the need to pluck or squeeze your skin?”).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… The Questionnaire for the Assessment of Self-Disgust (QASD; Schienle et al 2014 ) has two subscales “Disgusting Self” (nine items; Guttman’s λ4 = 0.81) and “Disgusting Ways” (six items; Guttman’s λ4 = 0.81) which assess disgust-related self-concept (e.g., “I find myself repulsive”) and behavior (e.g., “I regret my behavior”). The Skin Picking Scale revised (SPS-R; Gallinat et al 2016 ) has two sub scales (4 items each) which describe “symptom severity” (Cronbach`s α = 0.96) and “impairment” (α = 0.95) by the picking during the last week. Each item is rated on 5-point scales (e.g., “How often to you feel the need to pluck or squeeze your skin?”).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Skin Picking Scale revised (SPS-R; Gallinat et al 2016 ) has two sub scales (4 items each) which describe “symptom severity” (Cronbach`s α = 0.96) and “impairment” (α = 0.95) by the picking during the last week. Each item is rated on 5-point scales (e.g., “How often to you feel the need to pluck or squeeze your skin?”).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SPS-R consists of eight items assessing the two subscales, ‘symptom severity’ (frequency and intensity of the urge to pick, time spent on skin picking, control over the behavior) and ‘impairment’ (avoidance, interference and emotional distress due to skin picking, damage to skin caused by skin picking) in reference to the last week. The German translation of the SPS-R will be used in the present study [ 24 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No validated German instruments for the assessment of skin picking were available at the time the present study was conducted. The official, validated German translation of the Skin Picking Scale-Revised was published one year later (Gallinat, Keuthen & Backenstrass, 2016). Furthermore, skin picking occurrence could only be reported at item level due to the lack of a clinical cutoff score for the SPS-D_plus.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%