Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Introduction Tremor is often perceived as severely disabling by patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (iPD) and yet ranges among the most difficult symptoms to treat. To date, no comprehensive analysis of non‐lesional therapies to manage tremor in iPD exists to base recommendations upon. We therefore present a systematic literature review and meta‐analysis assessing the efficacy/effectiveness and safety of non‐lesional treatments for tremor in iPD. Methods Three electronic databases were searched using a combination of title/abstract keywords complemented by hand‐searching of reference lists. A random‐effects meta‐analysis of standardized mean change scores was conducted where appropriate. Results Some 114 studies met inclusion criteria involving 8045 patients. The meta‐analysis revealed an overall reduction of standardized mean change scores by (−0.93 [CI: −1.42; −0.43], p < 0.001) by 14 different dopaminergic and non‐dopaminergic classes of agents. No significant differences were identified between direct comparisons. Subgroup analysis comparing dopamine receptor agonists resulted in superior effects of pramipexole and rotigotine compared with ropinirole. There was little cumulative evidence to support the use of individual non‐pharmacological interventions for tremor, except for electrical stimulation. Conclusions The results of this meta‐analysis suggest a large but nonspecific effect of established pharmacological therapies on tremor in iPD. Based on high‐quality studies, there is sufficient evidence to support that levodopa, dopamine receptor agonists, and monoamine oxidase inhibitors provide tremor relief in most patients, while evidence supporting other treatments is less well established. Sufficient evidence to draw conclusions on effects of non‐lesional treatments in cases with refractory tremor is lacking.
Introduction Tremor is often perceived as severely disabling by patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (iPD) and yet ranges among the most difficult symptoms to treat. To date, no comprehensive analysis of non‐lesional therapies to manage tremor in iPD exists to base recommendations upon. We therefore present a systematic literature review and meta‐analysis assessing the efficacy/effectiveness and safety of non‐lesional treatments for tremor in iPD. Methods Three electronic databases were searched using a combination of title/abstract keywords complemented by hand‐searching of reference lists. A random‐effects meta‐analysis of standardized mean change scores was conducted where appropriate. Results Some 114 studies met inclusion criteria involving 8045 patients. The meta‐analysis revealed an overall reduction of standardized mean change scores by (−0.93 [CI: −1.42; −0.43], p < 0.001) by 14 different dopaminergic and non‐dopaminergic classes of agents. No significant differences were identified between direct comparisons. Subgroup analysis comparing dopamine receptor agonists resulted in superior effects of pramipexole and rotigotine compared with ropinirole. There was little cumulative evidence to support the use of individual non‐pharmacological interventions for tremor, except for electrical stimulation. Conclusions The results of this meta‐analysis suggest a large but nonspecific effect of established pharmacological therapies on tremor in iPD. Based on high‐quality studies, there is sufficient evidence to support that levodopa, dopamine receptor agonists, and monoamine oxidase inhibitors provide tremor relief in most patients, while evidence supporting other treatments is less well established. Sufficient evidence to draw conclusions on effects of non‐lesional treatments in cases with refractory tremor is lacking.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.