1968
DOI: 10.1007/bf01734125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Einfluß von Beta-Receptorenblockern und verwandten Substanzen auf Erregung, Kontraktion und Energiestoffwechsel der Myokardfaser

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

1969
1969
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Verapamil does not act therapeutically as a beta-adrenergic blocker (Ross and Jorgensen, 1967;Brichard and Zimmerman, 1970), nor does it have a quinidine-like action (Singh and Vaughan-Williams, 1972); as a calcium-ion antagonist and thus an antagonist of electromechanical coupling (Fleckenstein et al, 1968) it may belong to a novel class of antiarrhythmic agents (Singh and Vaughan-Williams, 1972).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Verapamil does not act therapeutically as a beta-adrenergic blocker (Ross and Jorgensen, 1967;Brichard and Zimmerman, 1970), nor does it have a quinidine-like action (Singh and Vaughan-Williams, 1972); as a calcium-ion antagonist and thus an antagonist of electromechanical coupling (Fleckenstein et al, 1968) it may belong to a novel class of antiarrhythmic agents (Singh and Vaughan-Williams, 1972).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was strongly negatively inotropic, flattened the plateau of the action potential (Singh & Vaughan Williams, 1972b), and in high concentration reduced Ca uptake by 'sarcoplasmic reticulum' (Fleckenstein, Doring & Kammermeier, 1968), though this was disputed (Graca & van Zweiten, 1971), and its relevance to surface inward Ca-current is highly doubtful. (Olsson, Cotoi & Varnauskas, 1971;Gavrilescu & Cotoi, 1972).…”
Section: Prolongation Ofaction Potential (Class 3 Action)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that verapamil and D 600 suppress the influx of Call in the membrane of the smooth muscle and suppress the contraction (19,21,22). These agents strongly suppress the membrane activity of spontaneously active smooth muscle rather than the quiescent muscle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%