2007
DOI: 10.1007/bf03356220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Einfluss von Vorfrucht, Aussaattermin, N-Düngung und Saatgutbehandlung mit Fluquinconazol auf die Entwicklung und den Kornertrag von Weizen sowie den Befall mit Schwarzbeinigkeit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3). This seems also to be achieved if winter wheat is grown after clovergrass, grain legumes or oilseed rape (Olesen et al, 2009;Sieling et al, 2007).…”
Section: Grain Yields Apparent Fertiliser N Use Efficiency Crude Prmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…3). This seems also to be achieved if winter wheat is grown after clovergrass, grain legumes or oilseed rape (Olesen et al, 2009;Sieling et al, 2007).…”
Section: Grain Yields Apparent Fertiliser N Use Efficiency Crude Prmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Another option to cope with yield reductions caused by take-all occurrence might be continuous cultivation of wheat since wheat monoculture can lead to the so-called take-all decline effect, addressing a low, or even undetectable, take-all disease severity after several years of wheat cultivation in a row; nevertheless, grain yield remained lower compared to wheat grown in crop rotation ( Cook, 2003 ). However, even without severe Ggt infection, wheat yield was reduced when grown after wheat, raising the question if other causes contribute to wheat yield decline ( Sieling et al., 2007 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effects of the crop rotational position on wheat biomass WW biomass at BBCH 29/30 in April was higher for W1 than for W2, W3 or WM on both field sites. Similarly, Sieling et al (2005;2007) reported a higher early biomass formation for WW grown after WOR compared to WW grown after WW from the crop rotation experiment at Hohenschulen. The higher WW biomass for W1 might have been caused by better root growth conditions after WOR, for example due to a lower PR, leading to an improved root density (Schönhammer and Fischbeck 1987) and the development of a deeper root system (Whalley et al 2008).…”
Section: Effects Of the Crop Rotational Position Of Wheat On Soil Str...mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…tritici (Ggt) and following root senescence. However, wheat yield decline is also found without severe Ggt infection (Sieling et al 2007), raising the question if other drawbacks, such as a soil structural degradation in wheat grown after wheat, contribute to yield decline (Sieling et al 2007). In a previous study, Sieling et al (2005) reported that biomass losses for wheat grown after wheat occurred at early growth stages and were persistent until later growth stages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%