2018
DOI: 10.1002/stab.201810571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Einflussfaktoren auf die Vorspannkraft von Schrauben mit Durchmessern bis M72 in Ringflanschverbindungen

Abstract: Bei Monopfahlgründungen von Offshore-Windenergieanlagen wird die Verbindung zwischen Monopfahl und Übergangsstück als geschraubter Ringflansch ausgeführt. Die zunehmende Leistungsfähigkeit der Windenergieanlagen führt zu immer größeren Schnittgrößen in diesem Anschluss. In der Folge erhöhen sich nicht nur die Querschnittsabmessungen, sondern es kommen auch zunehmend größere Schrauben zum Einsatz. Da die einschlägigen Regelwerke zur Bemessung dieser Verbindungen nicht für Schrauben der Größen M64 oder M72 konzi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is marked. Owing to the thick flange relative to the wall thickness, the origin is within the upper flange. The second example, a flange with a thick tower wall, has the same geometry as used by Schwedler et al . The diameter‐to‐thickness ratio is D / s = 93, i. e. significantly lower than for the previous example ( D / s = 173), but still within the range where shell bending theory is deemed to be applicable.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is marked. Owing to the thick flange relative to the wall thickness, the origin is within the upper flange. The second example, a flange with a thick tower wall, has the same geometry as used by Schwedler et al . The diameter‐to‐thickness ratio is D / s = 93, i. e. significantly lower than for the previous example ( D / s = 173), but still within the range where shell bending theory is deemed to be applicable.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a second example, the flange geometry as published by Schwedler et al [5], which was also used for the investigations in [6], is calculated. The stress transfer function is substantially more non‐linear (Fig.…”
Section: Influence Of Flange Dimensions On Stress Concentration Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%