1986
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-82779-2_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Einleitung

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this purpose, a new Disability Assessment Schedule (DAS) and a Psychologic Impairments Rating Schedule (PIRS) were developed. Disability and schizophrenic symptoms at followup after 2 years were significantly associated with sex (females did better) and with social class independently (Schubart et al 1986). Another study of Möller and von Zerssen (1986 b ) clearly showed that it makes sense to assess outcome with different instruments because different aspects of outcome are associated with different predictors.…”
Section: Methodological Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For this purpose, a new Disability Assessment Schedule (DAS) and a Psychologic Impairments Rating Schedule (PIRS) were developed. Disability and schizophrenic symptoms at followup after 2 years were significantly associated with sex (females did better) and with social class independently (Schubart et al 1986). Another study of Möller and von Zerssen (1986 b ) clearly showed that it makes sense to assess outcome with different instruments because different aspects of outcome are associated with different predictors.…”
Section: Methodological Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Prospective studies, by their nature, comprise shorter followup periods, up to now usually 5 years (Möller and von Zerssen 1986 b ; Schubart et al 1986). In association with this type of study, more sophisticated methods have been developed and applied.…”
Section: Methodological Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mason et al (1995) echo this point, "the status of symptoms may have little relevance to every-day social functioning". Schubart et al (1986) and the linked study of Biehl et al (1986) examine the course of social disability over the first five years using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS;WHO, 1992). Neither baseline clinical symptoms nor age or gender predicted social outcome at five years; only WHODAS scores at six months predicted outcome at one, two, three and five years.…”
Section: Critical Periodsmentioning
confidence: 99%