2001
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.87.069802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eisert, Wilkens, and Lewenstein Reply:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
265
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(269 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
4
265
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we emphasize that, for the class of games discussed here (i.e., Bayesian games), quantum mechanics provides a clear and indisputable advantage over classical resources, in the most general sense. This is in contrast with some previous approaches to quantum games 18 , based on non-Bayesian games (or complete games, such as Prisoner's dilemma), for which a quantum advantage is achieved only under specific restrictions, the relevance of which has been much debated [19][20][21][22] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, we emphasize that, for the class of games discussed here (i.e., Bayesian games), quantum mechanics provides a clear and indisputable advantage over classical resources, in the most general sense. This is in contrast with some previous approaches to quantum games 18 , based on non-Bayesian games (or complete games, such as Prisoner's dilemma), for which a quantum advantage is achieved only under specific restrictions, the relevance of which has been much debated [19][20][21][22] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Considering the quantum case, it is important to emphasize that the advantage provided by quantum resources is here fully general. Hence it does not rely on any specific restrictions, contrary to previous approaches to quantum games 18 , which then lead to controversy [19][20][21][22] . The main point is that these approaches focused on games with complete information (such as Prisoner's dilemma), where the notion of type is not present, in contrast to Bayesian games.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the entangling gate depends upon some parameter, then the classical game can be reproduced when this parameter is set to zero, representing no entanglement. In the present case this is problematic since the entangling gateĴ used by Eisert [4] and others [6,7,15,16,18] does not commute with the classical limit (all phases → 0) ofB, which was Eisert's motivation for the choice ofĴ. Thus this protocol would not reproduce the classical game when the phases are set to zero.…”
Section: A Quantum Parrondo Gamementioning
confidence: 87%
“…. 0 , apply an entangling gate, then the operators associated with the players strategies and finally a dis-entangling gate [4]. A measurement on the resulting state is taken and then the payoff is determined.…”
Section: A Quantum Parrondo Gamementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work of Knill, Laflamme and Milburn (KLM) has shown that in § bill.munro@hp.com principle universal quantum computation is possible with linear optics [1], and there have been a number of recent experimental demonstrations of its gate components [2,3,4]. However, due to the probabilistic nature of gates in linear optical QIP, it is practically rather inefficient (in terms of photon resources) to implement [5,6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%