2019
DOI: 10.35670/1667-4545.v19.n3.26776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

¿El Cuestionario de Aceptación y Acción II mide realmente la evitación experiencial?

Abstract: Experiential avoidance (EA) has played an important role in early and recent conceptualisations of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire II (AAQ-II; Bond et al., 2011) is largely used as a measure of EA, in spite of criticism about its validity. The present study examined the latent correlations between the AAQ-II and a new measure of EA: the Avoidance of Suffering Questionnaire (ASQ). In addition, correlations with the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ; Gillanders, 2014)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
4
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, it is relevant to consider that, despite the widespread use of the AAQ-II as a measure of experiential avoidance (EA) which correlates with mindfulness (Fledderus et al, 2012), EA has been conceptualized as the opposite of acceptance. Nevertheless, it has been criticized on the grounds that it does not adequately discriminate constructs like neuroticism or general distress (Valencia, 2019). Despite this difference with the AAQ-II, our results, and those found previously (Shapiro et al, 2011;Harnett et al, 2016;Tortella-Feliu et al, 2020), can most likely be generalized regardless of the sample characteristics and the instrument used to measure mindfulness.…”
Section: External Validity: Samples Instruments and Interactioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this regard, it is relevant to consider that, despite the widespread use of the AAQ-II as a measure of experiential avoidance (EA) which correlates with mindfulness (Fledderus et al, 2012), EA has been conceptualized as the opposite of acceptance. Nevertheless, it has been criticized on the grounds that it does not adequately discriminate constructs like neuroticism or general distress (Valencia, 2019). Despite this difference with the AAQ-II, our results, and those found previously (Shapiro et al, 2011;Harnett et al, 2016;Tortella-Feliu et al, 2020), can most likely be generalized regardless of the sample characteristics and the instrument used to measure mindfulness.…”
Section: External Validity: Samples Instruments and Interactioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…In this regard, it is relevant to consider that, despite the widespread use of the AAQ-II as a measure of experiential avoidance (EA) which correlates with mindfulness ( Fledderus et al, 2012 ), EA has been conceptualized as the opposite of acceptance. Nevertheless, it has been criticized on the grounds that it does not adequately discriminate constructs like neuroticism or general distress ( Valencia, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Avoidance of Suffering Questionnaire (ASQ; Valencia, 2019) It was constructed seeking to overcome the limitations of the instruments previously used to measure experiential avoidance. This measure is based on the Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (BEAQ; Gámez et al, 2014), so it can be considered a short, modified version of it.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If this instrument does not measure EA, it is questionable to make theoretical interpretations in this regard. It is necessary to attempt to replicate these findings with other instruments that provide clearer measures of EA (e.g., Valencia, 2019). To address these concerns, alternative measures like the Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (BEAQ; Gámez et al, 2014) have been proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Además, mostró una estructura en lugar de los ítems creados ad hoc para evaluar la evitación experiencial. De la misma manera, se ha comparado la AAQ-II con otros instrumentos que evalúan la evitación experiencial, obteniendo como resultado una baja relación con las escalas propuestas como medidas fiables del constructo (Valencia, 2019). En otros estudios, se ha encontrado un aparente solapamiento de los reactivos de la AAQ-II con instrumentos que evalúan el neuroticismo, el afecto negativo, la depresión, la ansiedad y el estrés, lo que puede deberse a una relación elevada entre sus ítems, constructos o extracción factorial (Rochefort et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified