1985
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1985)024<1311:enaawv>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

El Niño and Atmospheric Water Vapor: Observations from Nimbus 7 SMMR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
24
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4) exhibit a similar spatial pattern as the SST anomalies, showing a moistening center in the equatorial central and eastern Pacific but drying anomalies in the western equatorial Pacific and the off-equator tropical latitudes in both hemispheres. This feature is consistent with the results of Prabhakara et al (1985) and Takahashi et al (2013). The horizontal pattern of atmospheric water vapor anomalies remains largely unchanged throughout the troposphere but its amplitude decreases gradually with height in the lower troposphere and diminishes in the upper troposphere.…”
Section: An Overview Of the Key Features Of Atmospheric Anomalies Of supporting
confidence: 91%
“…4) exhibit a similar spatial pattern as the SST anomalies, showing a moistening center in the equatorial central and eastern Pacific but drying anomalies in the western equatorial Pacific and the off-equator tropical latitudes in both hemispheres. This feature is consistent with the results of Prabhakara et al (1985) and Takahashi et al (2013). The horizontal pattern of atmospheric water vapor anomalies remains largely unchanged throughout the troposphere but its amplitude decreases gradually with height in the lower troposphere and diminishes in the upper troposphere.…”
Section: An Overview Of the Key Features Of Atmospheric Anomalies Of supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Results of this work are compared with a previous analysis (using the Australian data) of the water vapor flux divergence field (Howarth, 1986) for the period June 1973 through May 1978 and with other independent estimates of the differences between evaporation and precipitation for the southern hemisphere published by Sellers (1965), Starr, Peixoto, and McKean (1969), Peixoto (1970Peixoto ( , 1972, Peixoto and Oort (1983), Bryan and Oort (1984), and Savijarvi (1988). Additional information about water vapor content and movement, which can be used to assess the current analyses, is found in Chen (1985), Prabhakara et al (1985), Kayano, Rao and Moura (1989), and Stephens (1990). This analysis thus extends the work of Howarth (1986), providing a basis for comparison with calculations for an earlier period and permitting an assessment of the impact of the 1982-1983 El Niño on the atmospheric water balance over the hemisphere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…With the introduction of operational numerical forecasting, however, it became necessary to generate three-dimemional fields of atmospheric variables over the hemisphere. Recent advances in modeling and in data assimilation procedures (Kinter and Shukla, 1990), along with the use of satellite-based remote sensing (Prabhakara, Short, and Vollmer, 1985), have provided information that has greatly increased our knowledge of the distribution and flow of water vapor over the hemisphere. Hence, despite some shortcomings (cf., Trenberth, Christy, and Olson, 1987), the analyses from numerical prediction centers constitute some of the best estimates of the state of the atmosphere currently available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From earlier studies (Chang and Wilheit 1979;Prabhakara et al 1985), we know the combination (T 21V -T 19V ) reflects the water vapor content in the atmosphere over the oceans in the absence of rain. Furthermore, over the clear skies T 21V is greater than T 19V .…”
Section: B Parameter ωmentioning
confidence: 99%