2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

El Niño forcing on 10Be-based surface denudation rates in the northwestern Peruvian Andes?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
4
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While these rates may appear fast compared to other rates from cosmogenic isotopes reported in the west central Andes (e.g., Abbühl et al, 2010, 2011; Carretier et al, 2015; Kober et al, 2007, 2009; Placzek et al, 2010; Starke et al, 2017), we note that the rates reported here are averages over long timescales of 10 7  years and could contain within them punctuated periods of activity with long periods of little exhumation. Also, though 3 χ 2 acceptable maximum values rise to ~0.8 km/Myr in the PC (Figure 10), these changes occur on shorter timescales and earlier in the mineral cooling histories where apparent exhumation is a less trustworthy indicator for mean regional exhumation or erosion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While these rates may appear fast compared to other rates from cosmogenic isotopes reported in the west central Andes (e.g., Abbühl et al, 2010, 2011; Carretier et al, 2015; Kober et al, 2007, 2009; Placzek et al, 2010; Starke et al, 2017), we note that the rates reported here are averages over long timescales of 10 7  years and could contain within them punctuated periods of activity with long periods of little exhumation. Also, though 3 χ 2 acceptable maximum values rise to ~0.8 km/Myr in the PC (Figure 10), these changes occur on shorter timescales and earlier in the mineral cooling histories where apparent exhumation is a less trustworthy indicator for mean regional exhumation or erosion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…More recent, shorter timescale denudation rates (<~10 6  years) based on catchment‐averaged 10 Be, 26 Al, and 21 Ne cosmogenic nuclide concentrations and exposure ages have been reported, as low as <1 m/Myr, up to several orders of magnitude lower than bedrock thermochronometric exhumation rates in the southern Peruvian and northern Chilean fore arc but range up to 300 m/Myr (~0.3 km/Myr) at higher elevations and slopes, particularly in the modern‐day Precordillera (Abbühl et al, 2010, 2011; Carretier, Regard, Vassallo, Aguilar, et al, 2015; Carretier, Regard, Vassallo, Martinod, et al, 2015; Kober et al, 2007, 2009; McPhillips et al, 2013; Placzek et al, 2010; Starke et al, 2017). Generally, higher rates are reported in southern Peru than in northern Chile but correlations with precipitation or hillslope angles are inconsistent (Abbühl et al, 2011; Kober et al, 2009; Reber et al, 2017; Starke et al, 2017) and extreme climatic events (e.g., El Niño) may be important (Abbühl et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Others have calculated an average scaling by integrating the product of topographic shielding and production on a pixel-by-pixel basis (e.g., Ouimet et al, 2009;Hurst et al, 2012;Scherler et al, 2014). Another strategy is to calculate both averaged topographic shielding and production scaling values for a basin (e.g., Abbühl et al, 2010). All of these approaches involve some degree of spatial averaging of production, shielding, or a combination of the two before catchment-averaged denudation rates can be estimated.…”
Section: Denudation Rates Across a Catchmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9). With the exception of a small dataset of erosion rates from the Washington Cascades (Moon et al, 2011), all oceanic-continent convergent zones erode more slowly than western Bhutan -for example, the Andes Mountains (Safran et al, 2005;Kober et al, 2007Kober et al, , 2009Vanacker et al, 2007;Abbühl et al, 2010;Insel et al, 2010;Placzek et al, 2010;Bookhagen and Strecker, 2012;Walcek and Hoke, 2012) and Panama (Nichols et al, 2005b;Sosa-Gonzalez, 2012) -though this comparison suffers from a lack of studies along oceanic plate subduction zones outside of South America. Compared to other continent-continent collisional zones, an ANOVA shows that erosion along the Himalayan Range (from all studies, Fig.…”
Section: Erosion In Active Orogensmentioning
confidence: 99%