Untitled

Ryan, Lori Verstegen; Ciavarella, Mark A.

doi:10.1023/a:1015729231274

Cited by 8 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Organizational leaders could use employee interviews and surveys to assess the strength of team moral approbation norms and perspective-taking norms. Team moral approbation norms can be assessed qualitatively by having individuals describe their team’s norm enforcement methods, and the extent those actions influence their ethical behaviors (Ryan & Ciavarella, 2002); or a survey measure to assess the form and strength of team norm enforcement could be created. To measure team perspective-taking norms, managers could use items from the Davis, Conklin, Smith, and Luce (1996) perspective-taking measure (see also Grant & Berry, 2011).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Teams with strong moral approbation norms make explicitly and implicitly clear to members the social sanctions or endorsements they should anticipate receiving for the potential courses of action they may take in a given ethical situation (Jones & Ryan, 1997, 1998Ryan & Ciavarella, 2002). Although individuals vary in the extent they feel a need for moral approbation from their team (Jones & Ryan, 1998), in general, levels of expected social accolades and acceptance significantly influence how individuals assess the appropriateness of their behaviors (Haidt & Kesebir, 2010), and thereby bear on affective self-sanctions (Bandura, 1991).…”

Section: Team Moral Approbation Normsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The generation and function of moral emotions in teams: An integrative review.

Dasborough¹,

Hannah²,

Zhu³

2020

Journal of Applied Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

By considering moral emotions in light of a team context, we offer a new way of thinking about the socially embedded nature of moral emotions and how they influence various types of ethical behaviors in teams. To achieve this goal, we review the key literature on moral emotions within teams. We integrate this literature with Bandura’s (1991, 2002, 2008) theory of moral thought and action, coupled with the social functional account of emotions (Keltner & Haidt, 1999) to examine how team norms are connected, through their influence on individual team members’ moral emotions, to ethical behavior within team contexts. This review and integration highlights how team norms regarding moral approbation and moral perspective taking influence members’ proscriptive (e.g., fear, guilt, shame, embarrassment) and prescriptive (e.g., sympathy/compassion, pride) moral emotions. In turn, each of these moral emotions has unique action tendencies linked to 1 or more of 3 different types of ethical behaviors witnessed in teams: compliance behaviors, humanistic behaviors, and supererogatory behaviors.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Team Moral Approbation Normsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The generation and function of moral emotions in teams: An integrative review.

Dasborough¹,

Hannah²,

Zhu³

2020

Journal of Applied Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

‘The Impact of Personal and Organizational Moral Philosophies on Marketing Exchange Relationships: A Simulation Using the Prisoner’s Dilemma Game’

Watkins

Hill

2005

J Bus Ethics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this research is to examine the impact of individual and firm moral philosophies on marketing exchange relationships. Personal moral philosophies range from the extreme forms of true altruists and true egoists, along with three hybrids that represent middle ground (i.e., realistic altruists, tit-for-tats, and realistic egoists). Organizational postures are defined as Ethical Paradigm, Unethical Paradigm, and Neutral Paradigm, which result in changes to personal moral philosophies and company and industry performance. The study context is a simulation of an exchange environment using a variation of the prisoners' dilemma game. A literature review is provided in the opening section, followed by details on the simulation, discussion of the results, and the implications for theory and practice.KEY WORDS: moral philosophies, marketing exchange relationships, prisoner's dilemma game.Since it is uppermost in the minds of businesspeople to survive and preferably survive well, will not moral business activity put businesspeople at a competitive disadvantage?

show abstract