2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elaboration enhances the imagined contact effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
250
3
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(273 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
17
250
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the degree of sensory detail and vividness of remembered and imagined helping events predicted willingness to help (Gaesser et al, 2015;Gaesser, DiBiase, & Kensinger, in press;Gaesser, Dodds, & Schacter, in press;Gaesser & Schacter, 2014). These findings are consistent with previous research related to imagination inflation (Garry & Polaschek, 2000;Hyman & Pentland, 1996;Husnu & Crisp, 2010;Mazzoni & Memon, 2003, see also D'Argembeau & Van der Linden, 2012 and related work showing that directly manipulating vividness can enhance the perceived probability of imagined events occurring in the future (Szpunar & Schacter, 2013). As the remembered or imagined helping episode is more vividly experienced, the helping event becomes more accessible (Anderson, 1983;Koehler, 1991;Tversky & Kahneman, 1973), providing 'evidentiary value' (Kappes & Morewedge, 2016) that one is willing to help in that situation.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, the degree of sensory detail and vividness of remembered and imagined helping events predicted willingness to help (Gaesser et al, 2015;Gaesser, DiBiase, & Kensinger, in press;Gaesser, Dodds, & Schacter, in press;Gaesser & Schacter, 2014). These findings are consistent with previous research related to imagination inflation (Garry & Polaschek, 2000;Hyman & Pentland, 1996;Husnu & Crisp, 2010;Mazzoni & Memon, 2003, see also D'Argembeau & Van der Linden, 2012 and related work showing that directly manipulating vividness can enhance the perceived probability of imagined events occurring in the future (Szpunar & Schacter, 2013). As the remembered or imagined helping episode is more vividly experienced, the helping event becomes more accessible (Anderson, 1983;Koehler, 1991;Tversky & Kahneman, 1973), providing 'evidentiary value' (Kappes & Morewedge, 2016) that one is willing to help in that situation.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Although the current manuscript investigated how remembering helping events can be used to facilitate prosocial responses, research on imagination inflation and related effects (Garry & Polaschek, 2000;Hyman & Pentland, 1996;Husnu & Crisp, 2010;Mazzoni & Memon, 2003, see also D'Argembeau & Van der Linden, 2012 suggests that activated episodes increase perceived likelihood that the event will occur regardless of event type or content. Therefore, how one remembers and represents harming events may under some circumstances actually increase antisocial behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Familiarity may also have enhanced the children's ability to elaborate the scenario. Elaboration is a factor that has been found to positively affect imagined contact efficacy (Husnu& Crisp, 2010). In other words, participants might find it easier to imagine engaging in an interaction with an unknown child in a familiar rather than in an unfamiliar environment.…”
Section: Findings Regarding the Imagined Contact Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mental imagery has been applied in many areas in psychology such as, clinical (Wolpe, 1958), cognitive (Paivio, 1968), and personality (Markus &Nurius, 1986) psychology. A growing body of research has shown that imagined contact improves intergroup attitudes (Turner, Crisp & Lambert, 2007) even among socially segregated groups (Husnu& Crisp, 2010), increases perception of positive traits to the outgroup (Stathi& and facilitates future contact intentions (Husnu& Crisp, 2010) while at the same time it reduces the outgroup homogeneity effect . The method has revealed positive effects even among young children on attitudes towards children from other ethnic-outgroups (Stathi, Cameron, Hartley & Bradford, 2014) and towards peers with disabilities (e.g., Cameron, Rutland, Turner, Holman-Nicolas & Powell, 2011) rendering the method as a promising prejudice reduction-intervention for use in school settings (Stathi et al, 2014).…”
Section: Intergroup Contactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Merely imagining positive interaction with a member of an out-group can elicit the same results as physical interactions [30]. Studies with various outgroups have shown the positive effects of imagined contact including; the elderly [31], gay men [26], Muslims [32][33][34][35], illegal immigrants [36] and people with schizophrenia [37].…”
Section: Imagined Contact Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 97%