2021
DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0014.8484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elaboration of stochastic models to comprehensive evaluation of occupational risks in complex dynamic systems

Abstract: Purpose: Elaborate stochastic models to comprehensive evaluation of occupational risks in “man - machine - environment” systems taking into account the random and dynamic nature of the impact on the employee of negative factors over time. Design/methodology/approach: Within study, the methods of probability theory and the theory of Markov processes - to find the limit distribution of the random process of dynamic impact on the employee of negative factors over time and obtain main rates against which the level… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A mandatory component of these programs is occupational risk assessment, which includes the identification of hazards inherent in technical vehicles, the driver and road conditions. In this case, in accordance with the requirements of the standard [23], the magnitude of occupational risk is calculated as the product of the probability of a dangerous situation and the severity of the consequences. This approach in determining the risk of an accident while driving leads to errors in the calculations, because it does not take into account the possibility of monitoring the psychophysiological state of the driver, which act as a "catalyst" for a dangerous event.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A mandatory component of these programs is occupational risk assessment, which includes the identification of hazards inherent in technical vehicles, the driver and road conditions. In this case, in accordance with the requirements of the standard [23], the magnitude of occupational risk is calculated as the product of the probability of a dangerous situation and the severity of the consequences. This approach in determining the risk of an accident while driving leads to errors in the calculations, because it does not take into account the possibility of monitoring the psychophysiological state of the driver, which act as a "catalyst" for a dangerous event.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "HAZOP" method and the "FMEA" method were chosen to assess occupational risks in rock transportation because they combine well with each other and allow detailing each stage of the production process to identify hazards and system performance as a whole, conducted by a specially selected experts group. In addition, their use to assess the degree of occupational risk of the driver is recommended by a number of regulatory requirements [20]- [23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Об'єктивне визначення, як рівня професійного ризику, так і відповідної суми страхових внесків є нетривіальним завданням, оскільки при цьому слід враховувати реальні характеристики випадкового і динамічного впливу на працівника небезпечних та шкідливих виробничих факторів, що ідентифіковані на кожному робочому місті. Тому, на практиці для розрахунку рівня професійного ризику і відповідної суми внесків, в більшості країн світу, де впроваджена зазначена система (як правило розвинуті країни, Німеччина, Бельгія, Франція, Іспанія, Португалія, Фінляндія, Люксембург) [25] використовуються методики, що основані на більш простих -експертних методах розрахунку [26][27][28].…”
Section: результатиunclassified
“…But the authors used FRAM to analyse only transport accidents, not fully revealing the method's relevance in terms of detecting all traffic hazards, which can pose a threat when combined. The judgment assessment based on event modelling is a desirable component of transportation risk management [ 27 , 28 , 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%