1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6793(199708)14:5<451::aid-mar2>3.0.co;2-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elaboration on experience: Effects on attribute importance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and "What would it feel like listening to music on your new iPod?"). Importantly, the experiential condition induces a focus on usage experience, shown to enhance the importance of attributes related to the experience of consuming a product (Huffman, 1997).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and "What would it feel like listening to music on your new iPod?"). Importantly, the experiential condition induces a focus on usage experience, shown to enhance the importance of attributes related to the experience of consuming a product (Huffman, 1997).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mediating effect of focus, Study 2 5 | STUDY 3: THE MATERIAL VERSUS EXPERIENTIAL iPods Studies 1 and 2 provide initial evidence for decreased risk aversion in experiential choices. Study 3 has two objectives: (a) to examine how personal connection to an offering can influence risky decision making and (b) to demonstrate that framing the same offering as experiential versus material (by emphasizing usage experience vs. purchase experience;Carter & Gilovich, 2012;Huffman, 1997) can shift participants to be more risk seeking. Specifically, Study 3 demonstrates that personal connection to the product class increases when purchases are construed in experiential terms rather than material terms and that these enhanced feelings of personal connection mediate the relation between product type (experiential vs. material) and risk-seeking choice (H3).Further, although expected values were objectively equal and subjective attractiveness of the options was pretested in Study 1, variations in the nature of the specific choice options might limit the generalizability of the findings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%