“…3(c) shows the charged multiplicity distribution in the annihilation model described above. The comparison with the experimental points taken from [23,24] serves as additional confirmation of our calculations.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…There is also shown the comparison of the charged multiplicity distribution in the annihilation model described in the text with the existent experimental data (c). Circles - [23], squares - [24].…”
The existence of antimatter domains in baryon asymmetrical Universe can appear as the cosmological consequence of particle theory in inflationary models with non-homogeneous baryosynthesis. Such a domain can survive in the early Universe and form globular cluster of antimatter stars in our Galaxy. The model of antimatter pollution of Galaxy and annihilation with matter gas is developed. The proton-antiproton annihilation gamma flux is shown to reproduce the observed galactic gamma background measured by EGRET. From comparison with observational data the estimation on the maximally allowed amount of antimatter stars, possibly present in our Galaxy, is found.
“…3(c) shows the charged multiplicity distribution in the annihilation model described above. The comparison with the experimental points taken from [23,24] serves as additional confirmation of our calculations.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…There is also shown the comparison of the charged multiplicity distribution in the annihilation model described in the text with the existent experimental data (c). Circles - [23], squares - [24].…”
The existence of antimatter domains in baryon asymmetrical Universe can appear as the cosmological consequence of particle theory in inflationary models with non-homogeneous baryosynthesis. Such a domain can survive in the early Universe and form globular cluster of antimatter stars in our Galaxy. The model of antimatter pollution of Galaxy and annihilation with matter gas is developed. The proton-antiproton annihilation gamma flux is shown to reproduce the observed galactic gamma background measured by EGRET. From comparison with observational data the estimation on the maximally allowed amount of antimatter stars, possibly present in our Galaxy, is found.
“…Data are taken from Refs. [75,67,76,73,77,78,79,80] (differential cross sections), [81,82,83] (analyzing powers), and [84] (D nn ). Note that contributions from J ≥ 5 become relevant for momenta above 400 MeV/c, but primarily at backward angles.…”
Abstract:Results for the antinucleon-nucleon (N N ) interaction obtained at next-to-nextto-next-to-leading order in chiral effective field theory (EFT) are reported. A new local regularization scheme is used for the pion-exchange contributions that has been recently suggested and applied in a pertinent study of the N N force within chiral EFT. Furthermore, an alternative strategy for estimating the uncertainty is utilized that no longer depends on a variation of the cutoffs. The low-energy constants associated with the arising contact terms are fixed by a fit to the phase shifts and inelasticities provided by a phase-shift analysis ofpp scattering data. An excellent description of theN N amplitudes is achieved at the highest order considered. Moreover, because of the quantitative reproduction of partial waves up to J = 3, there is also a nice agreement on the level ofpp observables. Specifically, total and integrated elastic and charge-exchange cross sections agree well with the results from the partial-wave analysis up to laboratory energies of 300 MeV, while differential cross sections and analyzing powers are described quantitatively up to 200-250 MeV. The low-energy structure of theN N amplitudes is also considered and compared to data from antiprotonic hydrogen.
“…In the pre-LEAR era a very large part of the experimental data on pp scattering consisted of elastic differential cross sections [110,104,129,132,128,113]. The most accurate data were those taken by Eisenhandler et al at 690, 790, and 860 MeV/c (and higher momenta) [128].…”
Section: The Nijmegen 1993 Antiproton-proton Database a Set-up Of The...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the advent of LEAR in 1983, also charge-exchange differential observables were scarce. Some differential cross sections existed [119,129,151,121,152], but these were not very accurate. Since 1984, however, the situation has improved enormously.…”
Section: The Nijmegen 1993 Antiproton-proton Database a Set-up Of The...mentioning
A partial-wave analysis of all antiproton-proton scattering data below 925
MeV/c antiproton laboratory momentum is presented. The method used is adapted
from the Nijmegen phase-shift analyses of pp and np scattering data. The
Nijmegen 1993 antiproton-proton database, consisting of 3646 antiproton-proton
scattering data, is presented and discussed. The best fit to this database
results in chi^2_min/Ndata = 1.043. The pseudovector coupling constant of the
charged pion to nucleons is determined to be (f_c)^2 = 0.0732(11) at the pion
pole, where the error is statistical.Comment: Report THEF-NYM 93.02 42 pages REVTeX, 7 separate postscript figures
appended. Accepted for publication in Phys. Rev.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.