1991
DOI: 10.1016/0956-716x(91)90413-u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elastic constants measurements of β Cu-Al-Be alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

1991
1991
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Microscale heterogeneity is not considered a disadvantage in nanostructured materials formed by SPD [ 3 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 ]. In the unmodified material, local hardness variations can be attributed to the elastic [ 62 ] and plastic anisotropy of the austenite grains. In the modified material, this effect is enhanced by the fact that the indentation size is comparable to the size of the microstructural features shown in Figure 4 d. Different behaviour can be expected if the centre of the indent coincides with the centre of an austenite zone or whether it is close to a martensite or grain boundary [ 63 , 64 , 65 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microscale heterogeneity is not considered a disadvantage in nanostructured materials formed by SPD [ 3 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 ]. In the unmodified material, local hardness variations can be attributed to the elastic [ 62 ] and plastic anisotropy of the austenite grains. In the modified material, this effect is enhanced by the fact that the indentation size is comparable to the size of the microstructural features shown in Figure 4 d. Different behaviour can be expected if the centre of the indent coincides with the centre of an austenite zone or whether it is close to a martensite or grain boundary [ 63 , 64 , 65 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finite element analysis was realized using ABAQUS software. The linear anisotropic elastic constants for a Cu-Al-Be SMA as published by (Rios-Jara et al, 1991) were used for a cubic symmetry, with C 11 = 141.6 GPa, C 12 = 127.4 GPa, C 44 = 94.2 GPa. The reference systems defined in section 1 were defined in every ABAQUS simulation so that the crystallographic orientation for all elements was defined by the measured Euler angles φ 1 = 181.6, ϕ = 93.9, φ 2 = 345.4.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para el CuBe se utilizaron los parámetros correspondientes al Cu, obteniendo una pendiente de 0.052 usando la ecuación (6) y 0.047 usando la ecuación (7). Para el CuAlBe se consideró la dependencia lineal con la temperatura dada por Rios Jara et al [16] obtenida mediante mediciones de ultrasonido y de las mismas se calcularon c 11 , c 12 y c 44 a distintas temperaturas. Mediante el modelo de Hill se calculó E a diferentes temperaturas, y en este caso la dependencia con la temperatura de E mostró una pendiente igual a 0.026, bastante inferior a la obtenida experimentalmente.…”
Section: Medición Del Módulo E a Diferentes Temperaturasunclassified
“…En la Figura 6 se presentan los resultados medidos experimentalmente de E, junto con el resultado arrojado por el cálculo según los modelos mencionados. Las constantes elásticas fueron obtenidas de [16] para CuAlBe, [17] para Cu y aluminio, y [18] para CuBe. Para CuBe y CuAlBe se ha representado el valor correspondiente al menor y al mayor tamaño de grano obtenido en este trabajo.…”
unclassified