2010
DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.50.613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elastic–Plastic and Inelastic Characteristics of High Strength Steel Sheets under Biaxial Loading and Unloading

Abstract: p ϭ0.02 are measured from the biaxial loading, unloading and reloading experiments. The moduli of elasticity at reloading were lower by 9 to 17 % than those at initial loading. The amount of strain recovery along the rolling direction (RD) is more than that along the transverse direction (TD) for uniaxial unloading, as well as for biaxial unloading. An exponential decay model is proposed that provides good reproduction of the unloading stress-strain relations, (s/s u )-De/(s u /E 2 ), of both materials under d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nonlinear elastic recovery finally leads to a decrease of elastic modulus by 70% for the magnesium after a 1-2% plastic strain [15] under the uniaxial unloading [16]. These values exceed the explainable range given by high order elastic constants and cannot be ignored in springback prediction.…”
Section: The Nonlinear Elastic Recoverymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The nonlinear elastic recovery finally leads to a decrease of elastic modulus by 70% for the magnesium after a 1-2% plastic strain [15] under the uniaxial unloading [16]. These values exceed the explainable range given by high order elastic constants and cannot be ignored in springback prediction.…”
Section: The Nonlinear Elastic Recoverymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This tendency is the same as that reported in the literature. 18,20) In case of the Al alloy sheet, such rapid decrease at the beginning hardly occurs and the gradient decreases very gradually from the beginning of unloading. Therefore, the difference in the gradients between the beginning and the end of unloading is smaller in the Al alloy sheet than the mild steel sheet.…”
Section: Experimental Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the biaxial tensile test method using a cruciform test piece has proven to be useful for accurately detecting and modeling the deformation behavior of sheet metals under biaxial tension and consequently improves the predictive accuracy of FEA for springback in stretch-bending [11], hole expansion in HSS sheet [12][13], surface deflection in automotive body panels [14], and hydraulic bulge forming of 6000 series aluminum alloy sheets [15]. A cruciform test piece is useful for biaxial load-unload tests of sheet metals [16] [17]. Successful FEA simulations of springback require suitable constitutive models that can capture the nonlinear strain recovery measured in these tests.…”
Section: Biaxial Tensile Testing Methods Using a Cruciform Test Piece mentioning
confidence: 99%