2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2017.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elastic-PPQ: A two-level autonomic system for spatial preference query processing over dynamic data streams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Approaches implementing Pane-based Spli ing. Mencagli et al [103,104] split large panes into sub-panes with a proportional-integrative-derivative controller (PID) that automatically adjusts the spli ing threshold. eir work focuses on burstiness in event arrival rates as to avoid bo lenecks.…”
Section: Parallelization For General Streammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches implementing Pane-based Spli ing. Mencagli et al [103,104] split large panes into sub-panes with a proportional-integrative-derivative controller (PID) that automatically adjusts the spli ing threshold. eir work focuses on burstiness in event arrival rates as to avoid bo lenecks.…”
Section: Parallelization For General Streammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such architecture, adaptation is done by employing Reinforced Learning techniques. In [36], Mencagli et al presented a two-level adaptation solution that handles workload variations at different time-scales: (i) fast time-scales (using a control theory based approach to deal with load imbalance) and (ii) slower time-scale (using fuzzy logic to for scaling decisions). However, both approaches are reactive and not proactive as PASCAL, not requiring any mechanism to estimate the system performance.…”
Section: Autoscaling Distributed Stream Processing Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors proposed two algorithms to be applied at different time-scales. but with a different role with respect to [36]. Also in this case the approach is reactive.…”
Section: Autoscaling Distributed Stream Processing Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other works (e.g., [7,[35][36][37][38]) use more complex centralized policies to determine the scaling decisions, exploiting optimization methods that rely on the knowledge of a global model, such as integer linear programming [7], control theory [35], queueing theory [36], and fuzzy logic [37]. In [7], we presented an integer linear programming problem for the run-time elasticity management of DSP applications that takes into account the application reconfiguration costs after scaling operations and aims to minimize them while satisfying the application performance requirements.…”
Section: Elasticity Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lohrmann et al [36] proposed a strategy that enforces latency constraints by relying on a predictive latency model based on queueing theory. Mencagli et al [37] presented a two-level adaptation solution that handles workload variations at different time-scales: at a fast time-scale, a control-theoretic approach is used to deal with load imbalance, while, at a slower time-scale, a global controller makes operator scaling decisions employing fuzzy logic. However, their solution is specifically designed for sliding-window preference queries executed on multi-core architectures.…”
Section: Elasticity Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%