1968
DOI: 10.1080/14786436808223035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elastic properties of isotropic graphite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
14
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results are shown with linear and exponential trend lines that are fit to the data. The functional form for the linear fit is suggested by the model developed by Hashin and Shtrikman and is supported by previous studies of particular graphites that have shown modulus values that vary nearly linearly with porosity [13,19,41] while the exponential fit is suggested by work presented by Cost et al [19]. Again, the porosity derived here is related to measurements of sample masses and volumes and does not include contributions to porosity that might be measured using other techniques such as BET surface area measurements that would involve all accessible surfacesincluding those associated with open microcracks.…”
Section: Variation Of Modulus With Bulk Porositysupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results are shown with linear and exponential trend lines that are fit to the data. The functional form for the linear fit is suggested by the model developed by Hashin and Shtrikman and is supported by previous studies of particular graphites that have shown modulus values that vary nearly linearly with porosity [13,19,41] while the exponential fit is suggested by work presented by Cost et al [19]. Again, the porosity derived here is related to measurements of sample masses and volumes and does not include contributions to porosity that might be measured using other techniques such as BET surface area measurements that would involve all accessible surfacesincluding those associated with open microcracks.…”
Section: Variation Of Modulus With Bulk Porositysupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The elastic responses of materials, including those associated with ultrasonic measurement, are generally assumed to depend on total porosity and there are many models in the literature that have been used to interpret the variation of elastic modulus with porosity. In early work on a type of isotropic graphite (POCO graphite), Cost et al measured Young's modulus and the shear modulus as a function of porosity over the approximate range 0.13 to 0.32 for the porosity volume fraction [19]. They considered using a linear fit for their results but instead used an exponential fit to model trends.…”
Section: Moduli Of Porous Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essentially, elastic constants that depend heavily on microcracks oriented along graphitic planes are significantly modified while others are not altered to any great degree. In addition, a value of r  0.984 was produced for the modified Hill averaging scheme indicating that the measured modulus values were close to those associated with the Reuss boundthe lower limitand this quantitative result is consistent with observations made previously in various graphites [53,54].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, other variations can be assumed and will yield different values for the moduli of theoretically dense graphite. For example, early work by Cost et al on a type of isotropic graphite assumed an exponential variation of modulus with porosity based on prevailing experimental evidence at that time [5]. Using an exponential fit to the data shown here yields modulus values at zero porosity of 32 and 13 GPa for Young's and the shear modulus respectively.…”
Section: B Elastic Moduli Vs Porositymentioning
confidence: 82%