1960
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.119.1981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elastic Scattering of Fast Neutrons by Tritium andHe3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
0

Year Published

1962
1962
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnitude and energy dependence of the beam-dependent background observed from targets containing no 3 H are consistent with the known 48 Ti(p, n) [39] and 49 Ti(p, n) [40] cross sections. Using the known Ti areal density, the background present in the measurements using the Cu-backed 3 H target is estimated to be at most 0.2%, and was therefore neglected.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The magnitude and energy dependence of the beam-dependent background observed from targets containing no 3 H are consistent with the known 48 Ti(p, n) [39] and 49 Ti(p, n) [40] cross sections. Using the known Ti areal density, the background present in the measurements using the Cu-backed 3 H target is estimated to be at most 0.2%, and was therefore neglected.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…[22][23][24]26], and references therein. The total cross section for 3 He(n, p) 3 H can also be found by subtracting the elastic neutron cross section from the total neutron cross section (see Seagrave, Cranberg, and Simmons [48] and Alfimenkov et al [49]). However, since the (n, p) cross section is a small fraction of the total cross section (for E n > ∼ 50 keV), this subtraction can be subject to rather large uncertainties.…”
Section: Appendix: Previous Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen by inspecting the two figures, the three curves almost always perfectly coincide and cannot be distinguished. We have also reported the experimental data for the n-3 H differential cross section [46] and the three p-3 He observables [29][30][31][32][33]35]. We note that the differences between the three calculations, where they can be appreciated, are in any case always smaller than the experimental errors.…”
Section: Lsjjz Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is shown in Figure 1, which plots (~crtot!7t)(p+3H--+n+3He); the experimental points are taken from Jarvis et al (1950), Bransden, Robertson, and Swan (1956), Jarvis (1957), Macklin and Gibbons (1958), and Seagrave, Cranberg, and Simmons (1960).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%