1960
DOI: 10.1007/bf02724988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elastic scattering π− + p at 915 MeV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1960
1960
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bonsignori and Selleri had evidently in mind our paper on elastic scattering, Ref. (9) , although they could not have found there an explicit indication as to the nucleon radius having a value "similar" to the Compton wave length of the pion. The cases at hand were offered by single pion production processes in nucleon-nucleon and pion nucleon processes (Fig.…”
Section: Enters Francomentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bonsignori and Selleri had evidently in mind our paper on elastic scattering, Ref. (9) , although they could not have found there an explicit indication as to the nucleon radius having a value "similar" to the Compton wave length of the pion. The cases at hand were offered by single pion production processes in nucleon-nucleon and pion nucleon processes (Fig.…”
Section: Enters Francomentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A mixed Bologna 8 -Trieste 9 group, joined by a visitor, Leo Lavatelli, a John Simon Guggenheim Fellow from the University of Illinois at Urbana, looked at π − + p elastic scattering, and measured its differential cross section. (9) The angular distribution showed an expected forward peak, interpreted as diffraction scattering, and a backward bump. The partial wave analysis showed that terms up to at least F-waves were necessary.…”
Section: A New Kind Of International Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Here, p is the probability that a given event would be detected, which takes account both of the neutral decay mode of the V°'s and of the escape probability; C is the ratio of the number of K~ decays in the reduced film sample (r~ contamination = 0.08=1=0.11%) to the total number of K~ decays, i.e., C corrects for the fact that these V° two-prong events were taken from the whole film sample, whereas the two-prong events were not. By this method, we concluded that 47=1=7 of the events in group P were due to reaction (11) and 54=1=8 in group x + were due to reactions (12) and (13).…”
Section: Inelastic Two-prong Eventsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In addition to producing inelastic two-prong events, reactions (10), (12), and (13) also produce V° two-prong events. These V° two-prong events are much less difficult to analyze than the inelastic two-prong events, and they have been studied in de tail , 2,3, The data on these V° two-prong events were used to determine the number of events remaining in group P due to reaction (10) and the number remaining in group ir + due to reactions (1.2) and (13).…”
Section: Inelastic Two-prong Eventsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation