2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2023.102558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elasto-geometrical error and gravity model calibration of an industrial robot using the same optimized configuration set

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 11 a shows a scatter plot of position errors before and after calibration at different points, with a noticeable reduction in error after calibration, signifying an improvement in accuracy post calibration. Figure 11 b illustrates a histogram of the frequency of position errors, comparing our method with three others: MDH [ 31 ], NTM [ 27 ], and RFCM [ 17 ]. Our method demonstrates fewer occurrences of higher errors, with the majority of errors congregating towards the lower end of the scale.…”
Section: Calibration Experiments Of Kinematic and Joint Compliance Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 11 a shows a scatter plot of position errors before and after calibration at different points, with a noticeable reduction in error after calibration, signifying an improvement in accuracy post calibration. Figure 11 b illustrates a histogram of the frequency of position errors, comparing our method with three others: MDH [ 31 ], NTM [ 27 ], and RFCM [ 17 ]. Our method demonstrates fewer occurrences of higher errors, with the majority of errors congregating towards the lower end of the scale.…”
Section: Calibration Experiments Of Kinematic and Joint Compliance Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The robot compliance model focuses on the elasticity of the materials constituting the robot, addressing deformation errors under applied forces [15,16]. Due to its own weight and external loads, the robot experiences structural deformation in its links and joints [17]. Current research on the joint stiffness modeling of six-degree-of-freedom robots mainly analyzes deformations in joints 2 and 3, establishing simplified linear torsion spring models [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They used measurements within the entire joint space to identify the model parameters and validated the robot model in a cube with a side length of 0.7m. A similar approach was proposed by Deng et al [22], which combined a kinematic and joint compliance model. They used a two-step method based on sequential floating forward selection to find the optimal set of robot configurations for parameter identification.…”
Section: ) Kinematic Calibration and Joint Error Compensationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the absolute positioning accuracy of the robots itself is relatively low, making it challenging to meet the machining precision requirements. In addition, due to its low stiffness, it is easy to produce machining deformation, resulting in low dimensional accuracy of the machined surface, affecting the use of the workpiece performance [5][6][7]. Error compensation is one of the most effective means to enhance machining accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%