1993
DOI: 10.1016/0143-974x(93)90003-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elasto-plastic behaviour of steel frame works

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Details of different tri-linear and quad-linear material models can be found in [10,[33][34][35]. The existing predictions of εsh and Esh show considerable variation, due mainly to the fact that each study has only examined a relatively limited set of steel grades, with data collected from a narrow range of sources.…”
Section: Existing Predictions Of εSh and Eshmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Details of different tri-linear and quad-linear material models can be found in [10,[33][34][35]. The existing predictions of εsh and Esh show considerable variation, due mainly to the fact that each study has only examined a relatively limited set of steel grades, with data collected from a narrow range of sources.…”
Section: Existing Predictions Of εSh and Eshmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boeraeve et al [33] proposed a quadlinear material model, using the tangent hardening modulus and recommended values of Esh = 2%E and εsh = 0.025 based on the interpretation of a series of experimental stress-strain curves with yield stress ranging from 235 N/mm 2 to 460 N/mm 2 . Sadowski et al [10] presented a statistical analysis of the post-yield material properties of several steel grades and proposed predictive expressions for Esh and the length of yield plateau based on regression analysis.…”
Section: Existing Predictions Of εSh and Eshmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One simply supported beam and a beam-column experiment are analyzed using the full shell model and its appropriateness established. Experiment D3 carried out by Boeraeve et al [20], which is a simply supported beam subjected to central concentrated load is analyzed using full shell model. The comparison of the full shell model with the result from experiment is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Calibration Of the Full Shell Model With Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strain hardening ratio of the steel was limited, as proposed by Lay and Galambos [28]. A comparison of the modified formulation with 45 standard beam type 1 tests (SB1T) performed in the literature [19,27,[29][30][31][32] on steel profiles classes 1 and 2 following Eurocode 3 provides a mean and COV of the ratios predicted to observed rotation capacities of 1.08 and 0.38, respectively, see Figure 3.…”
Section: Rotation Capacity Of Steel Membersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 represents the pushover analysis curve of this frame. The values of s p computed with the simplified method together with the application of the damage model with = 0.15, calibrated with both experimental tests (see References [19,27,[29][30][31][32]55]), produce a value of maximum plastic rotation demands at the life-safety limit of 0.036 rad. Inter-storey drift demands around 1.5-2% of the storey height are reported from seriously damaged buildings.…”
Section: Cyclic Behaviour Of Beam-to-column Connectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%