2000
DOI: 10.1029/2000jb900250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elastodynamic analysis for slow tectonic loading with spontaneous rupture episodes on faults with rate‐ and state‐dependent friction

Abstract: Abstract. We present an efficient and rigorous numerical procedure for calculating the elastodynamic response of a fault subjected to slow tectonic loading processes of long duration within which them are episodes of rapid earthquake failure. This is done for a general class of rate-and state-dependent friction laws with positive direct velocity effect. The algorithm allows us to treat accurately, within a single computational procedure, loading intervals of thousands of years and to calculate, for each earthq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

30
933
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 576 publications
(964 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
30
933
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is now generally assumed to be descended from an Arrhenius activated rate process describing creep at asperity contacts. That interpretation had been mentioned earlier by Stesky (1977), was implicit in Chester (1994), and was suggested explicitly, in the rate and state framework, by Heslot et al (1994), Brà echet and Estrin (1994), Baumberger (1997), Sleep (1997), Persson (1998), Baumberger et al (1999), Lapusta et al (2000), and Nakatani (2001). In such an interpretation, for the simple case of a single activated process, we write the slip rate as…”
Section: Physical and Empirical Basis For Standard Rate And State Lawsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is now generally assumed to be descended from an Arrhenius activated rate process describing creep at asperity contacts. That interpretation had been mentioned earlier by Stesky (1977), was implicit in Chester (1994), and was suggested explicitly, in the rate and state framework, by Heslot et al (1994), Brà echet and Estrin (1994), Baumberger (1997), Sleep (1997), Persson (1998), Baumberger et al (1999), Lapusta et al (2000), and Nakatani (2001). In such an interpretation, for the simple case of a single activated process, we write the slip rate as…”
Section: Physical and Empirical Basis For Standard Rate And State Lawsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…That is, for rapid enough changes in V so as for the surfaces to be at the same population of asperity contacts (i.e., at a constant value of the state variable), the variation of friction strength with slip rate V is generally found to involve a positive proportionality to ln(V ). This dependence is plausibly attributed to the presence of a thermally activated creep process at stressed asperity contacts (Stesky, 1977;Heslot et al, 1994;Chester, 1994;Brà echet and Estrin, 1994;Baumberger, 1997;Sleep, 1997;Persson, 1998;Baumberger et al, 1999;Lapusta et al, 2000;Nakatani, 2001) as discussed further. We also demonstrate how compromises from the full rate and state constitutive framework, in the direction of classical friction laws like pure velocity-dependent friction, of velocity-weakening type, do not allow a quasi-static range and, in fact, lead to paradoxical prediction of supersonic propagation of slip pulses (as recognized already by Weertman, 1969, andKnopo andLandoni, 1998), or to ill-posedness, depending on the strength of the velocity weakening.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The gelatin is characterized by a Maxwell time of ∼45 s. The material thus responds as a viscoelastic solid during the interseimic phase, and it is mainly elastic during the few seconds characterizing the slip phase. The rheological properties of gelatin are a fundamental factor to obtain a comprehensive model throughout the entire earthquake cycle including the interseismic viscoelastic deformation [e.g., Rice, 1993;Lapusta et al, 2000]. Tuning the lithospheric viscosity to higher values would increase the timescale without changing the essence of the physical process.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It starts at a time when the interseismic fault slip rate distribution is as expected for the slow-rate friction properties adopted in the model: patch A is mostly locked and patch B is creeping with the long-term plate rate, like the creeping areas that surround the two patches. During the following interseismic period, the locked region of patch A shrinks by penetration of creep from the surrounding areas, which occurs due to stress concentration at the boundary between creeping and locked regions (e.g., Tse and Rice, 1986;Lapusta et al, 2000). Earthquake rupture nucleates when the creeping region within patch A becomes comparable to the nucleation size estimates (Rice and Ruina, 1983;Rice et al, 2001;Rubin and …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%