2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2004.02550.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elastofibroma dorsi: histologic and echographic considerations

Abstract: Considering the strict correspondence between the characteristic histologic findings of elastofibroma and the specific ultrasound pattern, we believe that ultrasound investigation with color and power Doppler allows, in typical cases, a definitive diagnosis of elastofibroma.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25 These observations are similar to those of other studies and describe pathognomonic criteria. 26-28 In this study, the authors recommend a CT or MRI if the typical multi-layered pattern is missing on ultrasound. 25 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 These observations are similar to those of other studies and describe pathognomonic criteria. 26-28 In this study, the authors recommend a CT or MRI if the typical multi-layered pattern is missing on ultrasound. 25 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This concept has been reinforced by other studies, particularly when used to supplement CT and MRI. [30][31][32][33] Battaglia et al 34 studied 43 patients with proven elastofibroma using ultrasonography followed by CT and MRI. It was shown that, if a typical fasciculated pattern was evident on ultrasonography, elastofibroma could be diagnosed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colour Doppler shows vascularization patterns similar to the surrounding muscle. In the hands of an experienced examiner, ultrasound may represent a quick and cheap diagnostic tool [34-36]. Due to its muscle like appearance in all of the imaging procedures mentioned, the lesion may go undiagnosed or, in case of abnormal features, misdiagnosed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%