Elbow Kinematics After Radiocapitellar Arthroplasty

Sabo, Marlis T.; Shannon, Hannah L.; Luce, S. De; Lalone, Emily A.; Ferreira, Louis M.; Johnson, James A.; King, Graham J.W.

doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.02.021

Cited by 14 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This means that, during elbow flexion and extension, there was a decline in forearm movement in the transverse plane. Previous cadaveric studies have demonstrated that medial and lateral collateral ligament injury alters kinematics in the transverse plane 12,13) . According to the results of the present study, the reduction in movement magnitude resulting from compression therapy, appears to be due to stability in the Z axis that is guaranteed by compression.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Difference in Movement Magnitude According to the Type of Compression Therapy Used on Healthy Subjects

Rhee

Kim

2013

J Phys Ther Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract.[Purpose] This aim of this study was to determine the difference in the magnitude of upper extremity movement according to the type of compression device used as determined by three-dimensional motion analysis.[Subjects] The subjects selected for this study were 40 healthy adults. Out of the 40 participants, 9 were excluded from the study.[Methods] For the experimental procedure subjects randomly wore acompression garment, a bandage or neither. During each motion analysis, subjects performed elbow flexion and extension in a fixed range, 10 times, using their dominant hand.[Results] The wrist marker movement distances on the Z axis while wearing the compression garment and bandage were significantly lower than that of wearing nothing. The elbow marker movement distance on the Y axis and range of motion while wearing the compression bandage was significantly greater than that of wearing nothing or the compression garment. The shoulder marker movement distance on the X axis while wearing the compression bandage was significantly greater than that of wearing nothing or the compression garment.[Conclusion] Wearing a compression bandage reduces wrist and elbow movement and increases shoulder movement compared to wearing a compression garment or wearing neither. The appropriate use for a compression garment or a compression bandage must now be determined.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Difference in Movement Magnitude According to the Type of Compression Therapy Used on Healthy Subjects

Rhee

Kim

2013

J Phys Ther Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This may lead to the need for removal of the radial head implant or revision to a unicompartmental radiocapitellar arthroplasty. 10,16 The implant stem was cemented into the canal of the radius to ensure the quasi-anatomic and patient-specific radial head implants were both located in an optimal position. Because we used a custom stem to fit all implants, the axisymmetric implant was fixed in place as well.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of radial head implant shape on radiocapitellar kinematics during in vitro forearm rotation

Shannon

Deluce

Giles

et al. 2015

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…19,20 A previous biomechanical study supported the procedure with the result that the radiocapitellar arthroplasty showed no difference in kinematics under the condition with the intact MCL as compared with the control. 69 With the theoretical benefit of the procedure, it has been proposed and indicated as a reconstructive option for a combined radial head and capitellar arthritis to eliminate the pain source and to reconstruct the lateral column that shares an axial load to probably decelerate the process of arthritis in the ulnohumeral joint. 17,18 The surgical approach is basically similar with that of the radial head replacement; however, a sufficient exposure of capitellum needs to be addressed for an accurate measurement of implant size.…”

Section: Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Surgical management for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow

Kwak

Jeon

2021

J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this review is to summarize the surgical options for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow, reported clinical outcomes, and suggested indications in previous literatures. The surgical management of primary elbow arthritis has evolved because of an improved understanding of pathologic mechanisms and manifestations as well as the development of novel surgical techniques and devices. Osteocapsular arthroplasty (OCA), elbow debridement, distraction arthroplasty, and total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) have been employed for managing elbow osteoarthritis. Elbow debridement and OCA can be helpful in most cases of symptomatic elbow arthritis. TEA is usually recommended for end-stage arthritis in elderly patients after prosthetic implants have been in place for long periods or after complications. Distraction arthroplasty might find a place in the treatment of younger, active patients with end-stage arthritis.

show abstract

Elbow Kinematics After Radiocapitellar Arthroplasty

Cited by 14 publications

References 17 publications

Difference in Movement Magnitude According to the Type of Compression Therapy Used on Healthy Subjects

Difference in Movement Magnitude According to the Type of Compression Therapy Used on Healthy Subjects

The effect of radial head implant shape on radiocapitellar kinematics during in vitro forearm rotation

Surgical management for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About