Eldres erfaringer med hverdagsrehabilitering - Mestring og muligheter − krav og støtte i et dynamisk samspill

Jokstad, Kari; Landmark, Bjørg Th.; Hauge, Solveig; Skovdahl, Kirsti-Iren

doi:10.18261/issn.2387-5984-2016-03-07

Cited by 8 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Mastering activities increased users' confidence and self-efficacy. This is in line with findings from a study on users' experiences of reablement, in which researchers found that it is possible to start a reablement process even though users' faith in own capabilities and outlook for success are initially limited (Jokstad, Landmark, Hauge, & Skovdahl, 2016). We maintain that being more involved in co-creation processes simultaneously helps users uncover goals as a part of an embodied action, findings also supported by Struhkamp (2004).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Ideal and reality; Community healthcare professionals’ experiences of user‐involvement in reablement

Jokstad

Skovdahl

Landmark

et al. 2018

Health Soc Care Community

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many welfare states offer reablement, also known as restorative care, as an intervention to promote healthy ageing and support older adults in regaining or maintaining their independence in daily life. Reablement is a time‐limited, intensive, multidisciplinary, person‐centred and goal‐directed rehabilitative intervention. Reablement emanates from the user’s goals, thus user‐involvement is a key factor. The aim of our study was to explore healthcare professionals’ experiences of user‐involvement in reablement. The context for the study was an urban municipality in south‐eastern Norway where reablement had been implemented into home‐care services 1.5 years prior to the study. Eighteen healthcare professionals recruited from home‐care services participated in focus groups. The material was analysed using qualitative content analysis. The findings resulted in one main theme: Transforming user‐involvement from ideal to reality—a demanding process, and four sub‐themes: (a) An ideal of self‐determination and co‐operation; (b) Diverse ability to commit to what user‐involvement requires; (c) Continuous co‐creation processes; and (d) Challenged by old traditions. User‐involvement is a valued ideal that professionals strive towards when providing healthcare. Two main strategies that professionals use to enable user‐involvement were identified here: spending sufficient time and having patience with users during the initial stage of an intervention, and starting an intervention by introducing small tasks that users can master. It was also seen that if the time and arenas for interdisciplinary meetings were lacking, professionals could demonstrate traditional attitudes and practice when faced with limited user‐involvement in the intervention. There is a need for follow‐up over time at the structural, personal, and cultural levels to develop reablement as an intervention with a strong person‐centred approach. The findings of this study have relevance for practice development in several reablement settings.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Ideal and reality; Community healthcare professionals’ experiences of user‐involvement in reablement

Jokstad

Skovdahl

Landmark

et al. 2018

Health Soc Care Community

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Kvardagsrehabilitering krev at fagpersonane må samhandle tett, praktisere ut frå eit nytt tankesett og utføre nye oppgåver (Jokstad, Landmark, Hauge & Skovdahl, 2016;A. Moe, Ingstad & Brataas, 2017).…”

Section: Introduksjonunclassified

“…Moe, Ingstad & Brataas, 2017). Fagpersonane sine kunnskapar, haldningar og evner til å motivere er viktig for at kvardagsrehabiliteringa skal lykkast (Jokstad et al, 2016;. Moe (2017) studerte etableringa av kvardagsrehabilitering i ein kommune og peika på behovet for å utforske korleis tilsette i heimetenestene erfarer kvardagsrehabilitering, og korleis det er å arbeide i kvardagsrehabiliteringsteam.…”

Section: Introduksjonunclassified

Samhandling om kvardagsrehabilitering – ein kvalitativ studie

Sandvoll

Ruud

Sæterbakken

2020

TFO

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Studiar om fagpersonar sine erfaringar med samhandling om kvardagsrehabilitering er etterspurt. Hensikta med studien var å utforske og beskrive korleis tilsette erfarer samhandling om kvardagsrehabilitering. Gjennom 13 kvalitative intervju fekk vi innsikt i korleis tilsette i heimetenestene erfarer samhandlinga. Informantane beskriv ei ambivalens i samhandlinga. På den eine sida opplever informantane god samhandling i teamet, felles forståing for oppgåvene og lite konfliktar innanfor teamet. Samstundes erfarer informantane at samhandlinga med resten av heimetenestene er meir utfordrande. Denne ambivalensen kan forståast som at informantane opplever å stå i eit spenningsfelt mellom ope og lukka samarbeid. Vidare er fleksibilitet i samhandlinga viktig for at arbeidsoppgåvene skal bli gjort og kvardagen skal fungere. Informantane må ofte prioritere oppgåver i heimetenesta framfor kvardagsrehabilitering, og ta att oppdrag med kvardagsrehabilitering seinare på dagen. Fleksibiliteten er saerleg utfordrande for informantane med delt stilling i kvardagsrehabiliteringsteam og ordinaer heimeteneste. Prioriteringa av hasteoppgåver bremsar arbeidet med kvardagsrehabilitering. Informantane beskriv korleis digitalisering lettar samhandlinga mellom for eksempel fastlege, sjukehus og heimetenesta. Elektroniske verktøy fungerer som ein møteplass for samhandling. Det er behov for vidare utforsking av korleis digitalisering bidreg i samhandlinga om kvardagsrehabilitering.

show abstract

“…al., 2016, Whitehead, Worthington, Parry, Walker & Drummond, 2015. Noen kvalitative studier viser imidlertid at hverdagsrehabilitering er av positiv betydning for enkeltdeltakere, og ansatte opplever det faglig stimulerende å arbeide med hverdagsrehabilitering (Birkeland, Tuntland, Førland, Jacobsen & Langeland 2017, Førland & Skumsnes 2016, Hjelle, Skutle, Førland & Alvsvåg, 2016, Hjelle, Tuntland, Førland & Alvsvåg, 2016, Jokstad, Landmark, Hauge & Skovdahl, 2016, Wilde & Glendenning, 2012, Liaaen, 2015.…”

Section: Referee* Introduksjonunclassified