2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurox.2022.100165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elective induction of labour and expectant management in late-term pregnancy: A prospective cohort study alongside the INDEX randomised controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recently published prospective cohort study alongside the INDEX trial shows less composite adverse as well as less severe adverse perinatal outcomes in both the induction of labour (CAPO 1.1 %; SAPO 0.3 %) and expectant management (CAPO 1.9 %; SAPO 1.0 %) groups compared to the trial [7] . This could indicate selection bias in trial, which is likely when we compare baseline characteristics with higher BMI and anxiety and lower SES and quality of life in the trial population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The recently published prospective cohort study alongside the INDEX trial shows less composite adverse as well as less severe adverse perinatal outcomes in both the induction of labour (CAPO 1.1 %; SAPO 0.3 %) and expectant management (CAPO 1.9 %; SAPO 1.0 %) groups compared to the trial [7] . This could indicate selection bias in trial, which is likely when we compare baseline characteristics with higher BMI and anxiety and lower SES and quality of life in the trial population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For composite severe adverse perinatal outcome risks were 0.4 % after induction versus 1.3 % after expectant management (RR 0.3; 95 % CI 0.11–1.03) [3] . The INDEX cohort study — alongside the INDEX trial — found also lower incidences of adverse perinatal outcomes (IOL 1.1 % versus EM 1.9 %; adjRR 0.56; 95 % CI 0.17–1.79)) and severe adverse perinatal outcome (IOL 0.3 % versus EM 1.0 %; adjRR 0.39; 95 % CI 0.05–2.88)) than in the trial [7] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%