Electoral Behaviour in a European Union under Stress

Abstract

Is electoral behaviour affected by the current challenges of the EU and, if it is, through which channels and mechanisms? This study offers a cross-national analysis together with a broad understanding of both the crisis phenomenon and electoral behaviour. To investigate this research question appropriately, we first distinguish at the most general level between the two main behavioural alternatives at play when it comes to electoral behaviour, namely abstention and vote choice. Second, and no less important, we differentiate between the mechanisms that mediate the relationship between the ‘EU under stress’ and electoral behaviour, namely egocentric and sociotropic economic voting motivations. Drawing on data from the European Election Study 2014, our article provides important insights into the study of electoral behaviour in an EU under stress. First, we are able to show that the multiple crises that have hit the EU have the potential to determine both turnout and the decision to vote for a Eurosceptic party. Second, different mechanisms are in play for each of the two behavioural alternatives: Turnout is clearly related to egocentric determinants and thus depends on individuals’ personal exposure to the financial crisis. Conversely, the decision to vote for a Eurosceptic party is based on a different mechanism. Voters—without necessarily being personally affected by the crisis—have a higher propensity to vote for a Eurosceptic party if they perceive their country to be threatened by such an EU under stress. These findings add to a better understanding of the EU’s multi-level democracy.

Analysis on Election Models: Examining the Indonesian Case

“…Transparency is frequently regarded as one of the fundamental principles that should be upheld by electoral management bodies (EMBs), where officials lay out their objectives, responsibilities, and limitations. They also provide information about citizens' rights and voting procedures, engage with stakeholders frequently, and provide justifications for As for some previous research on the electoral process, one of them is from Braun and Tausendpfund whose discoveries help comprehend the multi-level democracy better (Braun & Tausendpfund, 2020). Besides, Jereoma suggested that the National Electoral Commission be independent and should employ its own legal counsel to supervise election-related legal issues, including the inclusion of electoral offenses as felonies under the various state laws (Jereoma, 2022).…”

Municipal Rating System—A Municipality Compliance Index

“…Through the structural approach, we were able to assign a differentiated weighting to the vectors of political intervention, combining this reality with citizens' perception of the local government's achievements. This model allows us to observe the levels and nature of the collective perception in relation to the public behavior of elected officials from a quantifiable, comparable, and predictive perspective of future electoral behavior (Braun and Tausendpfund 2020;Tavokin 1996).…”

Issues that mobilize Europe. The role of key policy issues for voter turnout in the 2019 European Parliament election

“…This was particularly the case in numerous countries that experienced economic hardship following the sovereign debt crisis and austerity politics in Europe. The ‘Euro crisis’ yielded severe political repercussions in elections all over Europe (Hernández and Kriesi, 2016) and already affected the previous European elections in 2014 (Braun and Tausendpfund, 2020; Hobolt and De Vries, 2016). The fact that the economy is a primary concern for many voters is certainly not a new insight, as the economic voting literature illustrates (Lewis-Beck and Stegmaier, 2000).…”