2018
DOI: 10.31752/idea.2018.46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electoral Risk Management Tool: Internal Factors Guide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An election is a highly complex process that is vulnerable to a range of security risks and threats. These can be the by-product of several factors, such as choice of the electoral system (majoritarian elections have been shown to produce high-stakes electoral contests associated with greater levels of electoral violence), EMB structural deficiencies, impunity of military and security forces, absence of checks and balances, ethnic polarization, communal conflict, armed violence, malpractice and fraud (Alihodžić and Asplund 2018). In this context, electoral stakeholders, particularly the NEC and its national security partners, are responsible for undertaking and enforcing security arrangements throughout the electoral cycle to ensure these processes' integrity, safety and security-and guarantee sufficient conditions for IDP's political participation.…”
Section: Election Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An election is a highly complex process that is vulnerable to a range of security risks and threats. These can be the by-product of several factors, such as choice of the electoral system (majoritarian elections have been shown to produce high-stakes electoral contests associated with greater levels of electoral violence), EMB structural deficiencies, impunity of military and security forces, absence of checks and balances, ethnic polarization, communal conflict, armed violence, malpractice and fraud (Alihodžić and Asplund 2018). In this context, electoral stakeholders, particularly the NEC and its national security partners, are responsible for undertaking and enforcing security arrangements throughout the electoral cycle to ensure these processes' integrity, safety and security-and guarantee sufficient conditions for IDP's political participation.…”
Section: Election Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To guarantee legitimate elections, USAID (2013) backs a mix of political and technical measures to lessen electoral conflict, including voter and political stakeholder capacity building and attitude reform programs. A credible and transparent election that everyone can recognize can be achieved through capacity building for voters, electoral actors, security, and electoral management institutions (Alihodžić & Asplund, 2018). Peace message, standards of behavior, and grassroots peace advocacy by civil society groups for stakeholders and voters are all interventions that contribute to creating capacity for peace (Opitz et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%