2009
DOI: 10.1134/s1063784209090199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electret effect and electrotransport in disperse organic and inorganic systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The intrinsically different electronic transport capabilities between HABE and PLA resulted in a charge barrier, and the formation of interfacial charges increased the number of deep charge traps. 57,58 Meanwhile, the movement of few volume charges from shallow to deep traps would also contribute to the amorphous−crystalline interfacial charge traps because electrons under an E-field are endowed with enough energy to be activated (Figure 3i). 59,60 The schematic diagram and photo for the filtration performance measurement setup are depicted in Figure 4a and Figure S7.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The intrinsically different electronic transport capabilities between HABE and PLA resulted in a charge barrier, and the formation of interfacial charges increased the number of deep charge traps. 57,58 Meanwhile, the movement of few volume charges from shallow to deep traps would also contribute to the amorphous−crystalline interfacial charge traps because electrons under an E-field are endowed with enough energy to be activated (Figure 3i). 59,60 The schematic diagram and photo for the filtration performance measurement setup are depicted in Figure 4a and Figure S7.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increased interphase of HABE–PLA and amorphous–crystalline PLA enhanced the polarization of HABE-modified PLA during solidification (Figure h). The intrinsically different electronic transport capabilities between HABE and PLA resulted in a charge barrier, and the formation of interfacial charges increased the number of deep charge traps. , Meanwhile, the movement of few volume charges from shallow to deep traps would also contribute to the amorphous–crystalline interfacial charge traps because electrons under an E-field are endowed with enough energy to be activated (Figure i). , …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intrinsically different electronic transport capabilities between PVDF and HAP resulted in a charge barrier, which is hard to overcome. As a result, charges tend to accumulate at the interfacial zones instead of being transferred from one to another, leading to the formation of interfacial charges [36] , [37] . It is worth noting that we propose that the classical Maxwell-Wagner effect can serve as an essential electret mechanism for ESNs, which might be identified as a progress since it has been employed to analyze the interfacial charges of buck bi-layer materials conventionally.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the addition of TiO 2 NPs increased the area between the crystalline and amorphous regions and introduced polar groups. The Maxwell-Wagner effect is caused by the interface between PVDF and TiO 2 NPs [37,38]. The charges in PVDF and TiO 2 NPs will move in the same direction under the action of an external electric field.…”
Section: 𝑃 = 𝑉 − 𝑉 𝑉mentioning
confidence: 99%