2013 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference 2013
DOI: 10.2514/6.2013-4283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electric Control Surface Actuator Design Optimization and Allocation for the More Electric Aircraft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Item 3, the constrained optimization of the actuator design, will form the focus of the second paper of this pair. 19 Finally, Item 4 is a study of the allocation of optimized actuator types (either EHA or EMA) to the aircraft control surfaces, which is significant since the primary and secondary flight control systems of a modern commercial aircraft consist of a large number of control surfaces, and it is quite possible that a MEA of the future may use both EHA and EMA design types for flight control actuation. Clearly then, the design of the flight control system of such an aircraft will involve not only the optimal design of the EHA and EMA units used, but also their optimal allocation to control surfaces.…”
Section: The Proposed Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Item 3, the constrained optimization of the actuator design, will form the focus of the second paper of this pair. 19 Finally, Item 4 is a study of the allocation of optimized actuator types (either EHA or EMA) to the aircraft control surfaces, which is significant since the primary and secondary flight control systems of a modern commercial aircraft consist of a large number of control surfaces, and it is quite possible that a MEA of the future may use both EHA and EMA design types for flight control actuation. Clearly then, the design of the flight control system of such an aircraft will involve not only the optimal design of the EHA and EMA units used, but also their optimal allocation to control surfaces.…”
Section: The Proposed Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, with the progress made in electric motor control and technology, the development of more electric aircraft control (MEAC) strategies have emerged. The main goal of this approach is arguably to reduce the the weight, complexity, and redundancy to cope with failure rates dictated by hydraulic components [1]. Designers have had to rethink the aircraft internal systems layout, limiting hydraulic components where possible and optimising layout of the new systems.…”
Section: Project Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, off-the-bench actuator data can be used to generate sizing databases and get estimates of actuator sizing by data interpolation, or using scaling methods. Rapid sizing tools with appropriate levels of accuracy have been developed in the past, specifically for EHA and EMA systems [1,[6][7][8]. Munjulury et al [6] proposed their method to scale EHA and EMA used as control surface actuators based on physical mathematical models for hydraulic components and scaling laws for the electric actuator components.…”
Section: Project Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowak [14] has focused on presenting an algorithm of the optimization of the dynamic parameters of an electromagnetic linear actuator operating in error-actuated control system. Other contributions in design optimization of electromechanical actuators include [15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%