2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.79.064001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electric dipole polarizabilities of hydrogen and helium isotopes

Abstract: The electric dipole polarizabilities of 3 H, 3 He, and 4 He are calculated directly using the Schrödinger equation with the latest generation of two-and three-nucleon interactions. These polarizabilities are necessary in order to obtain accurate nuclear-polarization corrections for transitions involving S-waves in one-and two-electron atoms. Our results are compared to previous results, and it is shown that direct calculations of the electric polarizability of 4 He using modern nuclear potentials are smaller t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
29
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
12
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lines with scatter-symbols are the results from the LIT-CCSD method obtained for different values of the frequency Ω of the harmonic oscillator basis used to expand the potential. As expected, the polarizability is independent of the oscillator frequency as one increases N max , and converges rapidly to a value α D = 0.0815 fm 3 , which compares fairly well with the EIHH [9] result of α D = 0.0831 fm 3 and α D = 0.0822(5) fm 3 obtained using the no-coreshell-model with the same interaction [17]. Moreover, the convergence with respect to the number of Lanczos coefficients used in Eq.…”
Section: Benchmark In 4 Hesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The lines with scatter-symbols are the results from the LIT-CCSD method obtained for different values of the frequency Ω of the harmonic oscillator basis used to expand the potential. As expected, the polarizability is independent of the oscillator frequency as one increases N max , and converges rapidly to a value α D = 0.0815 fm 3 , which compares fairly well with the EIHH [9] result of α D = 0.0831 fm 3 and α D = 0.0822(5) fm 3 obtained using the no-coreshell-model with the same interaction [17]. Moreover, the convergence with respect to the number of Lanczos coefficients used in Eq.…”
Section: Benchmark In 4 Hesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…There is more to physics than energy spectra however. For instance, we want to accurately quantify electric dipole transitions which lead to important observables that are difficult to measure: e.g., the polarization of a nucleus [27]; or the radiative capture 7 Be(p, γ) 8 B, crucial to understanding the neutrino signature of our sun [1,28]. When using SRG-evolved Hamiltonians, for consistency one should also evolve any other operator,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We choose the total dipole strength because it is used to compute important quantities such as photo-absorption cross sections [31] and electric polarizabilities [27]. Our second investigation focuses on operator renormalization as a function of range, following a prescription similar to that of Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also shown in the figure as a dotted line is the evaluation of Ref. [34] based on a LS renormalization of the N 3 LO NN plus N 2 LO 3N interactions and bare dipole operator.…”
Section: Srg Resolution Scale Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An ab initio investigation of both the photoabsorption cross section [33] and the electric polarizability [34] of the 4 He nucleus based on chiral N N + 3N interactions had already been accomplished in the past using LS effective interactions at the three-body cluster level [35,36], albeit without renormalization of the electric dipole operator. The primary purpose of the present work is to use these observables as testing grounds to explore the performance and consistency of the SRG approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%