1960
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.118.626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electric Field Distributions in an Ionized Gas. II

Abstract: W. H. FURRY AND N. F. RAMSEYfollowing statements can be made about the effects of the potentials in quantum theory : 1. These effects change only the phase of the wave function, and the phase changes are independent of the kinetic energy and kinetic momentum of the particle. Thus they are intrinsically quantum-mechanical effects, with no analog in classical theory.2. These effects do not affect the gauge invariance of the theory.3. These effects can have objective meaning only when they act differently on diff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

1964
1964
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Corrections to the Holtsmark microfield distribution [1], which is valid in the ideal-plasma limit, have been employed since the studies of Mozer and Baranger [2] and Hooper [3]. A convenient parameter to characterize the deviation of a plasma from ideality is the coupling parameter G, defined for a single-species gas of charged particles with charge z s and temperature T as…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corrections to the Holtsmark microfield distribution [1], which is valid in the ideal-plasma limit, have been employed since the studies of Mozer and Baranger [2] and Hooper [3]. A convenient parameter to characterize the deviation of a plasma from ideality is the coupling parameter G, defined for a single-species gas of charged particles with charge z s and temperature T as…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since that time much effort was put to include the collective effects into the theory of microfield distributions. The first remarkable advance was made by Baranger and Mozer [7,8] who wrote the distributions of the microfield components as expansions in terms of the correlation functions which then had been truncated at the pair correlation. However, it was argued that such an approach is valid only for low density, high-temperature plasmas where deviations from Holtsmark's original distribution are not large.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Schrödinger equation the electron contribution is described with a collision operator [17] and the ion contribution via an interaction Hamiltonian H = e r · E (linear Stark effect). For the electric field strengths produced by the ions we used the Mozer-Baranger distribution function [18,19], which is based on the Holtsmark distribution function [20] and additionally accounts for Debye shielding and ion-ion interactions. It should be noted here that the distribution function derived by Hooper [21,22] is similar to the one by Mozer-Baranger for our plasma conditions.…”
Section: Theory Of Stark Broadening In a Plasmamentioning
confidence: 99%