2023
DOI: 10.1007/s11571-022-09922-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electric field effects on neuronal input–output relationship by regulating NMDA spikes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thes results are consistent with the modulation effect of EF on pyramidal neuron. [24,25] Also, we identify the effects of dendritic morphology (dendritic length and branches), synaptic distributions (cluster and scatter) on EF-regulated dendritic integration. Our results show that the modulation influence of EF on global dendritic integration is more prominent than on local dendritic integration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thes results are consistent with the modulation effect of EF on pyramidal neuron. [24,25] Also, we identify the effects of dendritic morphology (dendritic length and branches), synaptic distributions (cluster and scatter) on EF-regulated dendritic integration. Our results show that the modulation influence of EF on global dendritic integration is more prominent than on local dendritic integration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify the influence of EFregulated dendritic integration on AP generation, we apply a current clamp to soma to reproduce the EF-induced somatic polarization. [24,25] The difference between EF stimulation and current clamp stimulation is the little dendritic polarization in the case of current clamp stimulation. Therefore, the respective contribution of EF-regulated dendritic integration and EFinduced somatic polarization to AP generation can be identified by comparing the synaptic threshold under the EF stimulation with that under the current clamp stimulation.…”
Section: Synaptic Activation and Analysis Of Input-output Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Decades of experimental and modeling studies have shown that the EF-induced polarization affects the spatial heterogeneity of membrane potential, which contributes to the variation of stimulation threshold for triggering action potential, spike timing and synaptic plasticity 17,18 . Especially, our previous studies pointed out that the EF-induced dendritic polarization plays an important role in the neuronal input-output relationship by affecting dendritic activities [19][20][21][22] . Therefore, the change of dendritic transmembrane potential caused by EFs seems to regulate the input-output function of TRN neuron via modulating IT -dependent dCa response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%