2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.119323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electric field-enhanced coupled with metal-free peroxymonosulfate activactor: The selective oxidation of nonradical species-dominated system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the reactivity of 1 O 2 with many organic contaminants have actually been fairly established in aquatic photochemistry, , especially for (substituted) phenols and phenolates. , 1 O 2 has been proved to be not the major oxidant during the photodegradation of sulfamethoxazole (SMX) since the rate constant of SMX with 1 O 2 is far too low to result any meaningful decomposition within an acceptable timescale [ k (SMX+1O2) = 2.0 × 10 4 M –1 s –1 ] Nevertheless, many recent AOP studies claimed that 1 O 2 could efficiently degrade SMX or other organic contaminants [e.g., carbamazepine (CBZ)] that have been reported to be recalcitrant to 1 O 2 attack . Moreover, 1 O 2 was even proposed to be able to mineralize organics (e.g., 4-chlorophenol) to CO 2 and H 2 O in a peroxymonosulfate-based AOP with 100% selectivity in generating 1 O 2 , but 1 O 2 is known to be too substrate-dependent to result in organic mineralization .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the reactivity of 1 O 2 with many organic contaminants have actually been fairly established in aquatic photochemistry, , especially for (substituted) phenols and phenolates. , 1 O 2 has been proved to be not the major oxidant during the photodegradation of sulfamethoxazole (SMX) since the rate constant of SMX with 1 O 2 is far too low to result any meaningful decomposition within an acceptable timescale [ k (SMX+1O2) = 2.0 × 10 4 M –1 s –1 ] Nevertheless, many recent AOP studies claimed that 1 O 2 could efficiently degrade SMX or other organic contaminants [e.g., carbamazepine (CBZ)] that have been reported to be recalcitrant to 1 O 2 attack . Moreover, 1 O 2 was even proposed to be able to mineralize organics (e.g., 4-chlorophenol) to CO 2 and H 2 O in a peroxymonosulfate-based AOP with 100% selectivity in generating 1 O 2 , but 1 O 2 is known to be too substrate-dependent to result in organic mineralization .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As displayed in Fig. 3d, when DMPO served as the spin-trapping agent towards SO 4 ˙−/˙OH and O 2 ˙−, 29 tiny and indistinct characteristics of DMPO-SO 4 ˙− or DMPO-˙OH adducts appeared, which was the same with the signal of the DMPO-O 2 − adduct. This result also manifests their minimal contribution to the degradation of TC.…”
Section: Identification Of Rosmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…However, such radical-based AOPs are less effective in degrading certain persistent organic pollutants (POPs) like the highly toxic halogenated phenols. The oxidation potential of 1 O 2 is relatively mild ( E 0 = 1.4–2.2 V), but it tends to attack the electron-rich organic compound [ 29 , 30 ]. Therefore, taking into account the degradation characteristics of ROS in AOP as well as the structural properties of specific molecules to design catalysts is expected to be effective in improving the advanced oxidative degradation of POPs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%