“…Notably, and as clearly observed in the inserted plot in Figure (b), for Q = 0.4 Å –1 , the proposed model captures the slight difference observed in the spectra of Mt and Ht. However, before we analyze in detail the results presented in Figure , it is important to recall that in clay minerals different populations of water molecules, classified according to their characteristic dynamics, coexist in the interlayer. ,, With this in mind, we can argue that the evolution of α(Q) vs Q corroborates the assumption that long-range processes are strongly coupled to local structural rearrangements (or structural relaxation), , where the presence of restricted diffusion is accounted for the observation that as Q → 0, α < 1 as depicted in Figure (a). , Of more interest is the consistent difference between α(Q) for Ht and Mt, suggesting different hydrogen relaxation processes in the two clay minerals. This is better understood by the analysis of the EISF, Figure (b), where we again observe almost the same Q-dependence for both samples, with slightly different magnitudes.…”