1973
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3719/6/10/004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electric-field-induced thermally detected EPR of non-Kramers ions in Al2O3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the sizes S of the Fe 2+ /Fe 2+ and V 3+ /V 3+ signals E and F relative to those in analyzed samples we estimate the majority and minority concentrations (Fe in V half, V in Fe half) to be, respectively, for V 3+ , 70 and <1 ppm; for Fe 2+ , 2 and 0.3 ppm, which are broadly consistent with specification if we take the Fe 2+ /Fe ratio to be -1/50 as in an as-received sample in which the Fe 2+ concentration was estimated roughly by EPR. 5 These sizes did not vary detectably with the position of the contacts showing that each half of the sample was rather homogeneous. Also, as expected, they did not depend It is clear, however, from Table I that at T" centered 6 mm from the interface the Fe 2 VV 3 + signals C, D, G, and H are considerably larger for H v injection than for H Fe injection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…From the sizes S of the Fe 2+ /Fe 2+ and V 3+ /V 3+ signals E and F relative to those in analyzed samples we estimate the majority and minority concentrations (Fe in V half, V in Fe half) to be, respectively, for V 3+ , 70 and <1 ppm; for Fe 2+ , 2 and 0.3 ppm, which are broadly consistent with specification if we take the Fe 2+ /Fe ratio to be -1/50 as in an as-received sample in which the Fe 2+ concentration was estimated roughly by EPR. 5 These sizes did not vary detectably with the position of the contacts showing that each half of the sample was rather homogeneous. Also, as expected, they did not depend It is clear, however, from Table I that at T" centered 6 mm from the interface the Fe 2 VV 3 + signals C, D, G, and H are considerably larger for H v injection than for H Fe injection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%