2020
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.0c04387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electric Field Induced Wetting of a Hydrophobic Gate in a Model Nanopore Based on the 5-HT3Receptor Channel

Abstract: In this study we examined the influence of a transmembrane voltage on the hydrophobic gating of nanopores using molecular dynamics simulations. We observed electric field induced wetting of a hydrophobic gate in a biologically inspired model nanopore based on the 5-HT 3 receptor in its closed state, with a field of at least ∼100 mV nm –1 (corresponding to a supra-physiological potential difference of ∼0.85 V across the membrane) required to hydrate the pore. We als… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
4
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 67 In these systems, the presence of a strong (e.g., greater than physiological) electric field corresponding to a transmembrane voltage difference of Δ V = 0.5–1 V drove hydration of an otherwise dewetted hydrophobic gate. The 5-HT 3 R M2 5 system has been employed as a biologically realistic model nanopore 68 which enables detailed exploration of this behavior, including the sensitivity to the water model employed ( Figure 6 ). It can be seen that complete wetting/hydration of the closed state (PDB id 4PIR; see above and Figures 3 and 4 ) requires a field strength in excess of 100 mV/nm (corresponding in this system to a transmembrane voltage difference of Δ V = 0.85 V) when the TIP3P water model is used.…”
Section: Computational Physical Chemistry Of Hydrophobic Gating In Plmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… 67 In these systems, the presence of a strong (e.g., greater than physiological) electric field corresponding to a transmembrane voltage difference of Δ V = 0.5–1 V drove hydration of an otherwise dewetted hydrophobic gate. The 5-HT 3 R M2 5 system has been employed as a biologically realistic model nanopore 68 which enables detailed exploration of this behavior, including the sensitivity to the water model employed ( Figure 6 ). It can be seen that complete wetting/hydration of the closed state (PDB id 4PIR; see above and Figures 3 and 4 ) requires a field strength in excess of 100 mV/nm (corresponding in this system to a transmembrane voltage difference of Δ V = 0.85 V) when the TIP3P water model is used.…”
Section: Computational Physical Chemistry Of Hydrophobic Gating In Plmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data shown in parts B and C are based on simulations of the M2 helix nanopore using the mTIP3P water model. Figure modified with permission from ref ( 68 ). Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.…”
Section: Computational Physical Chemistry Of Hydrophobic Gating In Plmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Electric-field-induced permeation of water and ions was observed in simulations of hydrophobic nanopores [65]; more recently, wetting of hydrophobic gates was demonstrated in simulations of biological ion channels in the presence of a strong electric field [35,66,67]. It has been suggested that the presence of an electric field can alter the liquid-vapour equilibrium of water inside hydrophobic gate, resulting in an increased probability of wetting [66]. This effect might have contributed to water and ion permeation in our simulations.…”
Section: A Hydrophobic Gate With Unusual Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The behaviour of a hydrophobic gate has been shown to depend critically on the radius of the pore and on the hydrophobicity of the pore lining [16][17][18][19] . Furthermore, in addition to these two structural parameters, the application of an electric field [20][21] or pressure [22][23] can also cause the pore to wet, thereby opening an otherwise closed channel to the passage of water and ions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%