Electric power transmission: An overview of associated burdens

Abstract

SUMMARYTransmission operators and regulators face the enormous challenge to meet both the request for a high-performing grid as well as the public's concern about the burdens of electric power transmission. Although huge infrastructural projects for the development of interconnections are at several stages, the associated transmission burdens are not yet fully incorporated in the respective socioeconomic analysis. In this respect, the aim of this paper is to present a collective summary of electricity transmission burdens and their associated impacts. To increase coherence, the burdens have been classified in the following categories: transmission losses; electromagnetic fields; infrastructure; visual intrusion; noise; interruption of supply; land use; ecosystems; and property values. Moreover, the burdens relation with transmission technologies and associated impacts are illustrated in original overview tables.

Conceptualizing a social sustainability framework for energy infrastructure decisions

“…The literature highlights a community-led desire to become more involved in decision-making processes, particularly regarding large-scale developments which can potentially impact upon the social, environmental and economic fabric of society [34,[115][116][117][118]. Continuing at the current level of community participation in decision-making may negatively impact upon the social sustainability of local communities, such as Anglesey, if decisions are made without those whom they impact upon most greatly, or without their tangible influence.…”

Landscape experiences as a cultural ecosystem service in a Nordic context

“…Some of these studies are included in the reviews mentioned above. One recent and interesting study that specifically review the literature on the burdens associated with power transmission, is Doukas et al (2011). A large number of studies quantify and monetize whether or not negative public perception is translated into lower property values or longer marketing periods in the proximity of high-voltage transmission lines.…”

“…A large number of studies quantify and monetize whether or not negative public perception is translated into lower property values or longer marketing periods in the proximity of high-voltage transmission lines. 28 In countries where transaction data are available, research Doukas et al (2011) review suggest the presence of distribution equipment may have a detrimental burden on the value of proximate residential property. The results, however, are very mixed going from no real effects to significant value diminution.…”

Maintenance of a High-Voltage Overhead Transmission Line: Sustainability and Noise Impact Assessment

“…Γ (A,HR) = − 650/g + 40 log 10 (d) + 15 log 10 (n) + 25 (3) and expressed in A-weighted decibels referred to 1 µW/m. The formulation is valid under the ranges of parameters g, d and n specified by the CIGRE guideline.…”

“…However, energy infrastructures are generally regarded with suspicion by the involved population, often bound to a "not in my backyard" mentality [2]: a paradox arises in the switch to sustainable sources of energy generating new sustainability challenges for the transmission lines transporting it. An analysis of the burdens coming with overhead transmission lines is presented in [3], where the authors take in consideration technical aspects (transmission loss and infrastructure costs), impact on the population (noise, electromagnetic fields and interruption of supply) and environmental effects (visual intrusion, ecosystems and land use). Population perception is a key-word in planning new energy assets [4], but the matter is so sensitive that other concepts, such as trust [5] and political ideology [6], can be drivers of success or failure stories.…”