2004
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.70.064419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electric quadrupolar contribution to the nuclear spin-lattice relaxation of Au and Ru in Fe

Abstract: The electric quadrupolar contribution to the nuclear spin-lattice relaxation of Au and Ru in Fe was determined by nuclear magnetic resonance on oriented nuclei. The magnetic and quadrupolar parts of the relaxation were separated by the comparison of relaxation measurements on 198 Au and 199 Au and on 97 Ru and 103 Ru in the same sample. The high-field limits of the magnetic relaxation constants were deduced to be R m = 1.95 ͑ +30 −49 ͒ ͑s K͒ −1 for 198 Au and R m = 0.48͑4͒ ͑s K͒ −1 for 97 Ru. The high-field li… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is close to R͑ϱ͒ = 8.97͑25͒ ͑s K͒ −1 , which follows from the literature value for IrFe from Ref. 53, if that value is corrected for the quadrupolar contribution to the relaxation 42 and if a consistent set of nuclear moments is used to convert that value to 186 Ir. In contrast, if the data are interpreted by R͑ϱ͒ + R ed + R gi , the parameter R͑ϱ͒ is about 20% smaller.…”
Section: E High-field Limitssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is close to R͑ϱ͒ = 8.97͑25͒ ͑s K͒ −1 , which follows from the literature value for IrFe from Ref. 53, if that value is corrected for the quadrupolar contribution to the relaxation 42 and if a consistent set of nuclear moments is used to convert that value to 186 Ir. In contrast, if the data are interpreted by R͑ϱ͒ + R ed + R gi , the parameter R͑ϱ͒ is about 20% smaller.…”
Section: E High-field Limitssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…We only mention that actually more sophisticated expressions for the transition rates were used, which are given in Ref. 42. However, the differences are not decisive in the context of this work.…”
Section: Relaxation Measurement By Nuclear Magnetic Resonance On mentioning
confidence: 99%