2014
DOI: 10.1002/bit.25201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical conditioning of adipose‐derived stem cells in a multi‐chamber culture platform

Abstract: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article A. Pavesi, M. Soncini, A. Zamperone, S. Pietronave, E. Medico, A. Redaelli, M. Prat and G. B. Fiore. Electrical conditioning of adipose-derived stem cells in a multi-chamber culture platform. Biotechnology and Bioengineering Volume 111, Issue 7, July 2014, Pages: 1452-1463 DOI: 10.1002 Abstract:In tissue engineering, several factors play key roles in providing adequate stimuli for cells differentiation, in particular biochemical and physical stimuli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kim et al first used EleS to pre-condition cells for the purpose of increasing the survival of transplanted CSC and enhancing their benefit to the ischemic heart (20). However, EleS has been used to promote the differentiation of CSC (23) and adipose-derived stem cells (24) into cardiomyocyte-type cells. Primarily, the difference between electrically pre-conditioning stem cells and inducing their differentiation may depend on the duration of EleS, as pre-conditioning was elicited by short-term EleS (3 hours) (20), while differentiation required long-term stimulation (14 days) (23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim et al first used EleS to pre-condition cells for the purpose of increasing the survival of transplanted CSC and enhancing their benefit to the ischemic heart (20). However, EleS has been used to promote the differentiation of CSC (23) and adipose-derived stem cells (24) into cardiomyocyte-type cells. Primarily, the difference between electrically pre-conditioning stem cells and inducing their differentiation may depend on the duration of EleS, as pre-conditioning was elicited by short-term EleS (3 hours) (20), while differentiation required long-term stimulation (14 days) (23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stimulated hiPSC biowire constructs showed increased myofibril ultra-structural organization (demonstrated by α-actinin and cTnT staining and imaging of desmosomes) increased conduction velocity and maximum capture rate, along with decreased excitation threshold and improved electrophysiological and Ca 2+ handling properties as shown by response to epinephrine [176]. In another study, a bioreactor was designed to deliver either monophasic (5 V for 2 ms, 1 Hz) or biphasic (+2.5 V for 1 ms, −2.5 V for 1 ms, 1 Hz) electrical pulses with tunable amplitude, pulse width, and frequency to human cardiac progenitors cultured on gelatin coated glass slides [344,361]. After 72 hours, biphasic electrical stimulation resulted in upregulation of early cardiac transcription factors (MEF2D, GATA-4, Nkx2.5), greater expression of late cardiac sarcomeric proteins (cTnT, cardiac α-actinin, and SERCA2a), and earlier expression of Cx43 compared to monophasic electrical stimulation [344].…”
Section: Electrical Stimulation Of Cardiac Constructsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another example, monophasic and biphasic pulsed electric fields were applied to the human cardiac progenitor cells (hCPCs) isolated from human heart fragment, and induced early differentiation towards a cardiac phenotype. Interestingly, only the biphasic fields showed effectiveness in the up-regulation of cardiac transcription factors [23]. Within the same AC electric field, cell differentiation could be a function of the field frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%